Nirwanapoker is one of Indonesia's leading online poker platform. As the official provider of IDNPoker games, they offer stable tables, fast transactions, and multi-layered security. Enjoy a fair gaming experience with an active community, competitive sign-up bonuses, and responsive customer service. Register now and experience the best, consistent, and trusted poker experience designed for both serious and novice players.
Data macau serves not only as a place to view results but also as a reference source for lottery enthusiasts, as it is frequently analyzed by bettors to identify number patterns. This output archive is organized by draw date and time, allowing readers to carefully evaluate historical results and compare the most recent period with previous ones.
If you are looking for professional logistics solutions with dependable refrigerated transportation services, United World Transportation is an excellent choice to support your business distribution needs. With more than 20 years of experience in the third-party logistics and transportation industry, UWT provides fast, secure, and efficient shipping services for various types of cargo, including frozen goods and fresh food products.
Each idnslot platform website has different policies, features, and terms and conditions. Users are advised to review the official rules and use the service responsibly in accordance with applicable regulations.
sunfloromash.com is a Ukrainian machine-building company specializing in the production of premium agricultural harvesting equipment. The company focuses on innovative and cost-effective farming machinery designed to improve harvesting efficiency while reducing crop losses. Their product lineup includes corn headers, sunflower headers, grain headers, header trailers, and agricultural transport solutions built for heavy-duty farming conditions.

1990 100 Avant (4A,C4)

1990 100 (4A,C4)

1988 100 (C3, Typ 44,44Q, facelift 1988)

1988 100 Avant (C3, Typ 44, 44Q, facelift 1988)

1982 100 (C3, Typ 44,44Q)

1982 100 Avant (C3, Typ 44, 44Q)

1979 100 Avant (C2, Typ 43, facelift 1979)

1979 100 (C2, Typ 43, facelift 1979)

1977 100 Avant (C2, Typ 43)

1976 100 (C2, Typ 43)

1974 100 (C1, facelift 1973)

1970 100 Coupe S

1968 100 (C1)

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 1990 Station wagon (estate) | 4790 mm | 1805 mm | 1454 mm | 2692 mm | 1660 kg |
| Body | 100 1990 Station wagon (estate) |
|---|---|
| Length | 4790 mm |
| Width | 1805 mm |
| Height | 1454 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2692 mm |
| Weight | 1660 kg |
1990 Audi 100 dimensions are as follows:
In 1990 Audi 100 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 1990 Audi 100 dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 16V | 4790 mm / 1777 mm / 1440 mm | 28.51 Nm | 35 mm per 1 hp | 1.38 cc in 1 mm | 59 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.6 V6 | 4790 mm / 1777 mm / 1448 mm | 21.29 Nm | 32 mm per 1 hp | 1.79 cc in 1 mm | 94 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.8 V6 E | 4790 mm / 1777 mm / 1448 mm | 19.16 Nm | 28 mm per 1 hp | 1.91 cc in 1 mm | 74 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.8 E | 4790 mm / 1777 mm / 1440 mm | 19.16 Nm | 28 mm per 1 hp | 1.92 cc in 1 mm | 68 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.3 E | 4790 mm / 1775 mm / 1448 mm | 25.75 Nm | 36 mm per 1 hp | 1.59 cc in 1 mm | 74 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.5 TDI | 4790 mm / 1777 mm / 1440 mm | 18.08 Nm | 42 mm per 1 hp | 1.71 cc in 1 mm | 51 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 E | 4790 mm / 1777 mm / 1448 mm | 28.51 Nm | 42 mm per 1 hp | 1.37 cc in 1 mm | 63 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.2 S4 Turbo | 4790 mm / 1805 mm / 1454 mm | 13.69 Nm | 21 mm per 1 hp | 1.53 cc in 1 mm | 75 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 | 4790 mm / 1777 mm / 1440 mm | 30.51 Nm | 47 mm per 1 hp | 1.38 cc in 1 mm | 61 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.4 D | 4790 mm / 1777 mm / 1440 mm | 29.21 Nm | 58 mm per 1 hp | 1.65 cc in 1 mm | 57 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4790 mm / 1777 mm / 1440 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 28.51 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 35 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.38 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 59 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.6 V6 |
| Length / width / height | 4790 mm / 1777 mm / 1448 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 21.29 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 32 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.79 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 94 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.8 V6 E |
| Length / width / height | 4790 mm / 1777 mm / 1448 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 19.16 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 28 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.91 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 74 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.8 E |
| Length / width / height | 4790 mm / 1777 mm / 1440 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 19.16 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 28 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.92 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 68 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.3 E |
| Length / width / height | 4790 mm / 1775 mm / 1448 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.75 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 36 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.59 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 74 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.5 TDI |
| Length / width / height | 4790 mm / 1777 mm / 1440 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 18.08 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 42 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.71 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 51 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 E |
| Length / width / height | 4790 mm / 1777 mm / 1448 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 28.51 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 42 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.37 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 63 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 S4 Turbo |
| Length / width / height | 4790 mm / 1805 mm / 1454 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 13.69 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 21 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.53 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 75 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 |
| Length / width / height | 4790 mm / 1777 mm / 1440 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 30.51 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 47 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.38 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 61 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.4 D |
| Length / width / height | 4790 mm / 1777 mm / 1440 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 29.21 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 58 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.65 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 57 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 1990 Sedan | 4790 mm | 1777 mm | 1437 mm | 2692 mm | 1470 kg |
| Body | 100 1990 Sedan |
|---|---|
| Length | 4790 mm |
| Width | 1777 mm |
| Height | 1437 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2692 mm |
| Weight | 1470 kg |
1990 Audi 100 dimensions are as follows:
In 1990 Audi 100 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 1990 Audi 100 dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.8 V6 E | 4790 mm / 1777 mm / 1431 mm | 19.16 Nm | 28 mm per 1 hp | 1.94 cc in 1 mm | 66 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.6 V6 | 4790 mm / 1777 mm / 1431 mm | 21.29 Nm | 32 mm per 1 hp | 1.82 cc in 1 mm | 66 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.5 TDI | 4790 mm / 1777 mm / 1431 mm | 18.08 Nm | 42 mm per 1 hp | 1.72 cc in 1 mm | 46 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.3 E | 4790 mm / 1777 mm / 1437 mm | 25.75 Nm | 36 mm per 1 hp | 1.61 cc in 1 mm | 74 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 | 4790 mm / 1777 mm / 1431 mm | 30.51 Nm | 47 mm per 1 hp | 1.39 cc in 1 mm | 59 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 E | 4790 mm / 1777 mm / 1437 mm | 28.51 Nm | 42 mm per 1 hp | 1.38 cc in 1 mm | 63 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 E 16V | 4790 mm / 1777 mm / 1431 mm | 26.46 Nm | 35 mm per 1 hp | 1.39 cc in 1 mm | 71 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.4 D | 4790 mm / 1777 mm / 1431 mm | 29.21 Nm | 58 mm per 1 hp | 1.66 cc in 1 mm | 54 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.8 V6 E |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4790 mm / 1777 mm / 1431 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 19.16 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 28 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.94 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 66 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.6 V6 |
| Length / width / height | 4790 mm / 1777 mm / 1431 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 21.29 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 32 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.82 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 66 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.5 TDI |
| Length / width / height | 4790 mm / 1777 mm / 1431 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 18.08 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 42 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.72 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 46 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.3 E |
| Length / width / height | 4790 mm / 1777 mm / 1437 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.75 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 36 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.61 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 74 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 |
| Length / width / height | 4790 mm / 1777 mm / 1431 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 30.51 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 47 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.39 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 59 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 E |
| Length / width / height | 4790 mm / 1777 mm / 1437 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 28.51 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 42 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.38 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 63 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 E 16V |
| Length / width / height | 4790 mm / 1777 mm / 1431 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 26.46 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 35 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.39 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 71 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.4 D |
| Length / width / height | 4790 mm / 1777 mm / 1431 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 29.21 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 58 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.66 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 54 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 1988 Sedan | 4793 mm | 1814 mm | 1422 mm | 2687 mm | 1410 kg |
| Body | 100 1988 Sedan |
|---|---|
| Length | 4793 mm |
| Width | 1814 mm |
| Height | 1422 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2687 mm |
| Weight | 1410 kg |
1988 Audi 100 dimensions are as follows:
In 1988 Audi 100 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 1988 Audi 100 dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.8 | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm | 31.95 Nm | 53 mm per 1 hp | 1.25 cc in 1 mm | 91 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.2 Turbo CAT | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm | 19.97 Nm | 29 mm per 1 hp | 1.57 cc in 1 mm | 82 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.2 Turbo | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm | - | 25 mm per 1 hp | - | - |
| 2.3 E CAT | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm | 25.23 Nm | 35 mm per 1 hp | 1.62 cc in 1 mm | 70 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 D | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm | 38.97 Nm | 68 mm per 1 hp | 1.4 cc in 1 mm | 52 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 D Turbo | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm | 24.96 Nm | 48 mm per 1 hp | 1.4 cc in 1 mm | 52 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 E | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm | 28.19 Nm | 42 mm per 1 hp | 1.4 cc in 1 mm | 67 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.8 CAT | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm | 33.75 Nm | 53 mm per 1 hp | 1.25 cc in 1 mm | 70 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 E CAT | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm | 27.87 Nm | 42 mm per 1 hp | 1.4 cc in 1 mm | 70 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.2 E | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm | 25.49 Nm | 35 mm per 1 hp | 1.57 cc in 1 mm | 67 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.2 CAT | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm | 25.49 Nm | 35 mm per 1 hp | 1.57 cc in 1 mm | 76 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.3 E | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm | 25.77 Nm | 36 mm per 1 hp | 1.62 cc in 1 mm | 70 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.4 D | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm | 29.23 Nm | 58 mm per 1 hp | 1.67 cc in 1 mm | 55 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.5 TDI | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm | 18.09 Nm | 40 mm per 1 hp | 1.73 cc in 1 mm | 47 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.3 | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm | 25.23 Nm | 35 mm per 1 hp | 1.62 cc in 1 mm | 70 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.8 |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 31.95 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 53 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.25 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 91 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 Turbo CAT |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 19.97 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 29 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.57 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 82 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 Turbo |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm |
| Length to width ratio | - |
| Length per 1 hp | 25 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | - |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |
| Vehicle | 2.3 E CAT |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.23 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 35 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.62 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 70 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 D |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 38.97 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 68 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.4 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 52 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 D Turbo |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 24.96 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 48 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.4 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 52 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 E |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 28.19 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 42 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.4 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 67 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.8 CAT |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 33.75 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 53 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.25 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 70 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 E CAT |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 27.87 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 42 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.4 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 70 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 E |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.49 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 35 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.57 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 67 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 CAT |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.49 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 35 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.57 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 76 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.3 E |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.77 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 36 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.62 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 70 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.4 D |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 29.23 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 58 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.67 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 55 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.5 TDI |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 18.09 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 40 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.73 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 47 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.3 |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.23 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 35 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.62 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 70 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 1988 Station wagon (estate) | 4793 mm | 1814 mm | 1422 mm | 2687 mm | 1450 kg |
| Body | 100 1988 Station wagon (estate) |
|---|---|
| Length | 4793 mm |
| Width | 1814 mm |
| Height | 1422 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2687 mm |
| Weight | 1450 kg |
1988 Audi 100 dimensions are as follows:
In 1988 Audi 100 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 1988 Audi 100 dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.3 CAT | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm | 25.23 Nm | 35 mm per 1 hp | 1.62 cc in 1 mm | 82 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 TD | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm | 24.96 Nm | 48 mm per 1 hp | 1.4 cc in 1 mm | 60 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 E CAT | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm | 27.87 Nm | 42 mm per 1 hp | 1.4 cc in 1 mm | 76 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 D | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm | 38.97 Nm | 68 mm per 1 hp | 1.4 cc in 1 mm | 52 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.3 | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm | 25.23 Nm | 35 mm per 1 hp | 1.62 cc in 1 mm | 86 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.2 Turbo CAT | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm | 19.97 Nm | 29 mm per 1 hp | 1.57 cc in 1 mm | 86 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.8 | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm | 33.06 Nm | 53 mm per 1 hp | 1.25 cc in 1 mm | 91 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.8 CAT | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm | 33.75 Nm | 53 mm per 1 hp | 1.25 cc in 1 mm | 73 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.2 CAT | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm | 25.49 Nm | 35 mm per 1 hp | 1.57 cc in 1 mm | 67 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.2 | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm | 25.49 Nm | 35 mm per 1 hp | 1.57 cc in 1 mm | 76 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.4 D | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm | 29.23 Nm | 58 mm per 1 hp | 1.67 cc in 1 mm | 67 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.5 TDI | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm | 18.09 Nm | 40 mm per 1 hp | 1.73 cc in 1 mm | 63 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.3 CAT |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.23 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 35 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.62 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 82 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 TD |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 24.96 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 48 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.4 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 60 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 E CAT |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 27.87 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 42 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.4 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 76 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 D |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 38.97 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 68 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.4 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 52 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.3 |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.23 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 35 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.62 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 86 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 Turbo CAT |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 19.97 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 29 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.57 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 86 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.8 |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 33.06 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 53 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.25 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 91 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.8 CAT |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 33.75 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 53 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.25 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 73 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 CAT |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.49 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 35 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.57 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 67 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.49 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 35 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.57 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 76 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.4 D |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 29.23 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 58 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.67 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 67 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.5 TDI |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1421 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 18.09 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 40 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.73 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 63 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 1982 Sedan | 4793 mm | 1814 mm | 1422 mm | 2687 mm | 1410 kg |
| Body | 100 1982 Sedan |
|---|---|
| Length | 4793 mm |
| Width | 1814 mm |
| Height | 1422 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2687 mm |
| Weight | 1410 kg |
1982 Audi 100 dimensions are as follows:
In 1982 Audi 100 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 1982 Audi 100 dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.2 E Turbo | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm | 19.97 Nm | 29 mm per 1 hp | 1.57 cc in 1 mm | 82 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.3 E | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm | 25.36 Nm | 35 mm per 1 hp | 1.62 cc in 1 mm | 70 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.8 | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm | - | 54 mm per 1 hp | - | - |
| 2.0 | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm | 28.19 Nm | 42 mm per 1 hp | 1.4 cc in 1 mm | - |
| 1.9 | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm | 31.95 Nm | 48 mm per 1 hp | 1.35 cc in 1 mm | - |
| 2.0 D | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm | 38.97 Nm | 68 mm per 1 hp | 1.4 cc in 1 mm | 53 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 D Turbo | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm | 27.87 Nm | 55 mm per 1 hp | 1.4 cc in 1 mm | 55 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.1 | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm | 26.63 Nm | 35 mm per 1 hp | 1.51 cc in 1 mm | - |
| 2.2 CAT | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm | 29.05 Nm | 42 mm per 1 hp | 1.57 cc in 1 mm | 76 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.2 E | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm | 27.87 Nm | 40 mm per 1 hp | 1.57 cc in 1 mm | 82 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.2 | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm | 25.49 Nm | 35 mm per 1 hp | 1.57 cc in 1 mm | 73 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.2 Turbo | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm | 19.97 Nm | 29 mm per 1 hp | 1.57 cc in 1 mm | 76 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.3 | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm | 25.23 Nm | 35 mm per 1 hp | 1.62 cc in 1 mm | 70 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 E Turbo |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 19.97 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 29 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.57 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 82 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.3 E |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.36 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 35 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.62 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 70 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.8 |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm |
| Length to width ratio | - |
| Length per 1 hp | 54 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | - |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |
| Vehicle | 2.0 |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 28.19 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 42 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.4 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |
| Vehicle | 1.9 |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 31.95 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 48 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.35 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |
| Vehicle | 2.0 D |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 38.97 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 68 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.4 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 53 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 D Turbo |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 27.87 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 55 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.4 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 55 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.1 |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 26.63 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 35 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.51 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |
| Vehicle | 2.2 CAT |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 29.05 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 42 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.57 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 76 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 E |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 27.87 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 40 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.57 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 82 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.49 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 35 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.57 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 73 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 Turbo |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 19.97 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 29 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.57 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 76 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.3 |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.23 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 35 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.62 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 70 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 1982 Station wagon (estate) | 4793 mm | 1814 mm | 1422 mm | 2687 mm | 1450 kg |
| Body | 100 1982 Station wagon (estate) |
|---|---|
| Length | 4793 mm |
| Width | 1814 mm |
| Height | 1422 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2687 mm |
| Weight | 1450 kg |
1982 Audi 100 dimensions are as follows:
In 1982 Audi 100 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 1982 Audi 100 dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.8 | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm | 33.06 Nm | 53 mm per 1 hp | 1.25 cc in 1 mm | 63 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.8 CAT | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm | 34.73 Nm | 53 mm per 1 hp | 1.25 cc in 1 mm | 70 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.9 | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm | 31.95 Nm | 48 mm per 1 hp | 1.35 cc in 1 mm | 79 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 CAT | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm | 29.05 Nm | 42 mm per 1 hp | 1.4 cc in 1 mm | 76 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 D | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm | 38.97 Nm | 68 mm per 1 hp | 1.4 cc in 1 mm | - |
| 2.0 E | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm | 28.19 Nm | 42 mm per 1 hp | 1.4 cc in 1 mm | 70 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 TD | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm | 27.87 Nm | 55 mm per 1 hp | 1.4 cc in 1 mm | 53 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.1 | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm | 26.63 Nm | 35 mm per 1 hp | 1.51 cc in 1 mm | 82 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.2 | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm | 25.49 Nm | 35 mm per 1 hp | 1.57 cc in 1 mm | 73 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.2 E | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm | 25.49 Nm | 40 mm per 1 hp | 1.57 cc in 1 mm | 73 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.2 Turbo | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm | 19.97 Nm | 29 mm per 1 hp | 1.57 cc in 1 mm | 82 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.2 Turbo CAT | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm | 19.97 Nm | 29 mm per 1 hp | 1.57 cc in 1 mm | 76 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.3 | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm | 25.23 Nm | 35 mm per 1 hp | 1.62 cc in 1 mm | 70 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.3 E | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm | 25.23 Nm | 35 mm per 1 hp | 1.62 cc in 1 mm | 70 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.8 |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 33.06 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 53 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.25 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 63 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.8 CAT |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 34.73 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 53 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.25 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 70 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.9 |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 31.95 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 48 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.35 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 79 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 CAT |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 29.05 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 42 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.4 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 76 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 D |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 38.97 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 68 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.4 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |
| Vehicle | 2.0 E |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 28.19 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 42 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.4 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 70 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 TD |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 27.87 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 55 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.4 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 53 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.1 |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 26.63 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 35 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.51 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 82 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.49 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 35 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.57 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 73 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 E |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.49 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 40 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.57 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 73 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 Turbo |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 19.97 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 29 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.57 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 82 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 Turbo CAT |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 19.97 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 29 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.57 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 76 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.3 |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.23 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 35 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.62 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 70 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.3 E |
| Length / width / height | 4793 mm / 1814 mm / 1422 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.23 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 35 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.62 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 70 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 1979 Station wagon (estate) | 4590 mm | 1768 mm | 1390 mm | 2677 mm | 1210 kg |
| Body | 100 1979 Station wagon (estate) |
|---|---|
| Length | 4590 mm |
| Width | 1768 mm |
| Height | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2677 mm |
| Weight | 1210 kg |
1979 Audi 100 dimensions are as follows:
In 1979 Audi 100 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 1979 Audi 100 dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.9 | 4590 mm / 1768 mm / 1390 mm | 31.44 Nm | 46 mm per 1 hp | 1.38 cc in 1 mm | - |
| 2.1 L | 4590 mm / 1768 mm / 1390 mm | 25.36 Nm | 34 mm per 1 hp | 1.54 cc in 1 mm | 80 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.6 L | 4590 mm / 1768 mm / 1390 mm | 37.93 Nm | 54 mm per 1 hp | 1.14 cc in 1 mm | 71 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 D | 4590 mm / 1768 mm / 1390 mm | 37.32 Nm | 66 mm per 1 hp | 1.43 cc in 1 mm | 55 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.9 |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4590 mm / 1768 mm / 1390 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 31.44 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 46 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.38 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |
| Vehicle | 2.1 L |
| Length / width / height | 4590 mm / 1768 mm / 1390 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.36 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 34 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.54 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 80 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.6 L |
| Length / width / height | 4590 mm / 1768 mm / 1390 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 37.93 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 54 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.14 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 71 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 D |
| Length / width / height | 4590 mm / 1768 mm / 1390 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 37.32 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 66 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.43 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 55 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 1979 Sedan | 4683 mm | 1768 mm | 1390 mm | 2677 mm | 1210 kg |
| Body | 100 1979 Sedan |
|---|---|
| Length | 4683 mm |
| Width | 1768 mm |
| Height | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2677 mm |
| Weight | 1210 kg |
1979 Audi 100 dimensions are as follows:
In 1979 Audi 100 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 1979 Audi 100 dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.1 L | 4683 mm / 1768 mm / 1390 mm | 25.87 Nm | 34 mm per 1 hp | 1.54 cc in 1 mm | 74 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.6 L | 4683 mm / 1768 mm / 1390 mm | 38.7 Nm | 55 mm per 1 hp | 1.14 cc in 1 mm | 71 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 D | 4683 mm / 1768 mm / 1390 mm | 38.07 Nm | 67 mm per 1 hp | 1.43 cc in 1 mm | 55 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.9 | 4683 mm / 1768 mm / 1390 mm | 32.08 Nm | 47 mm per 1 hp | 1.38 cc in 1 mm | 68 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.1 L |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4683 mm / 1768 mm / 1390 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.87 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 34 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.54 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 74 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.6 L |
| Length / width / height | 4683 mm / 1768 mm / 1390 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 38.7 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 55 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.14 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 71 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 D |
| Length / width / height | 4683 mm / 1768 mm / 1390 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 38.07 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 67 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.43 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 55 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.9 |
| Length / width / height | 4683 mm / 1768 mm / 1390 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 32.08 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 47 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.38 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 68 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 1977 Station wagon (estate) | 4587 mm | 1768 mm | 1390 mm | 2677 mm | 1210 kg |
| Body | 100 1977 Station wagon (estate) |
|---|---|
| Length | 4587 mm |
| Width | 1768 mm |
| Height | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2677 mm |
| Weight | 1210 kg |
1977 Audi 100 dimensions are as follows:
In 1977 Audi 100 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 1977 Audi 100 dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.6 L | 4587 mm / 1768 mm / 1390 mm | 37.91 Nm | 54 mm per 1 hp | 1.14 cc in 1 mm | 74 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 D | 4587 mm / 1768 mm / 1390 mm | 37.29 Nm | 66 mm per 1 hp | 1.43 cc in 1 mm | 59 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.1 L | 4587 mm / 1768 mm / 1390 mm | 28.14 Nm | 40 mm per 1 hp | 1.54 cc in 1 mm | 84 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 LS | 4587 mm / 1768 mm / 1390 mm | 27.8 Nm | 40 mm per 1 hp | 1.43 cc in 1 mm | 88 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.6 L |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4587 mm / 1768 mm / 1390 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 37.91 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 54 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.14 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 74 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 D |
| Length / width / height | 4587 mm / 1768 mm / 1390 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 37.29 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 66 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.43 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 59 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.1 L |
| Length / width / height | 4587 mm / 1768 mm / 1390 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 28.14 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 40 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.54 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 84 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 LS |
| Length / width / height | 4587 mm / 1768 mm / 1390 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 27.8 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 40 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.43 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 88 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 1976 Sedan | 4680 mm | 1768 mm | 1390 mm | 2677 mm | 1210 kg |
| Body | 100 1976 Sedan |
|---|---|
| Length | 4680 mm |
| Width | 1768 mm |
| Height | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2677 mm |
| Weight | 1210 kg |
1976 Audi 100 dimensions are as follows:
In 1976 Audi 100 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 1976 Audi 100 dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.6 L | 4680 mm / 1768 mm / 1390 mm | 38.68 Nm | 55 mm per 1 hp | 1.14 cc in 1 mm | 74 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 D | 4680 mm / 1768 mm / 1390 mm | 38.05 Nm | 67 mm per 1 hp | 1.43 cc in 1 mm | 59 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 LS | 4680 mm / 1768 mm / 1390 mm | 28.36 Nm | 41 mm per 1 hp | 1.43 cc in 1 mm | 88 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.1 L | 4680 mm / 1768 mm / 1390 mm | 28.71 Nm | 41 mm per 1 hp | 1.54 cc in 1 mm | 84 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.6 L |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4680 mm / 1768 mm / 1390 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 38.68 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 55 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.14 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 74 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 D |
| Length / width / height | 4680 mm / 1768 mm / 1390 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 38.05 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 67 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.43 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 59 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 LS |
| Length / width / height | 4680 mm / 1768 mm / 1390 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 28.36 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 41 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.43 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 88 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.1 L |
| Length / width / height | 4680 mm / 1768 mm / 1390 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 28.71 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 41 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.54 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 84 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 1974 Sedan | 4635 mm | 1729 mm | 1421 mm | 2675 mm | 1100 kg |
| Body | 100 1974 Sedan |
|---|---|
| Length | 4635 mm |
| Width | 1729 mm |
| Height | 1421 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2675 mm |
| Weight | 1100 kg |
1974 Audi 100 dimensions are as follows:
In 1974 Audi 100 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 1974 Audi 100 dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.8 | 4600 mm / 1729 mm / 1421 mm | 34.07 Nm | 54 mm per 1 hp | 1.24 cc in 1 mm | 79 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.8 LS | 4635 mm / 1729 mm / 1421 mm | 30.9 Nm | 46 mm per 1 hp | 1.24 cc in 1 mm | 79 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.9 GL | 4635 mm / 1729 mm / 1421 mm | 28.97 Nm | 41 mm per 1 hp | 1.32 cc in 1 mm | 82 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.6 | 4635 mm / 1729 mm / 1421 mm | 37.99 Nm | 55 mm per 1 hp | 1.12 cc in 1 mm | 75 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.8 |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4600 mm / 1729 mm / 1421 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 34.07 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 54 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.24 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 79 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.8 LS |
| Length / width / height | 4635 mm / 1729 mm / 1421 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 30.9 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 46 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.24 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 79 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.9 GL |
| Length / width / height | 4635 mm / 1729 mm / 1421 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 28.97 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 41 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.32 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 82 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.6 |
| Length / width / height | 4635 mm / 1729 mm / 1421 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 37.99 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 55 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.12 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 75 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 1970 Coupe | 4398 mm | 1750 mm | 1341 mm | 2560 mm | 1100 kg |
| Body | 100 1970 Coupe |
|---|---|
| Length | 4398 mm |
| Width | 1750 mm |
| Height | 1341 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2560 mm |
| Weight | 1100 kg |
1970 Audi 100 dimensions are as follows:
In 1970 Audi 100 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 1970 Audi 100 dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.9 | 4398 mm / 1750 mm / 1341 mm | 27.66 Nm | 38 mm per 1 hp | 1.4 cc in 1 mm | 88 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.9 |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4398 mm / 1750 mm / 1341 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 27.66 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 38 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.4 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 88 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 1968 Sedan | 4638 mm | 1730 mm | 1425 mm | 2675 mm | 1100 kg |
| Body | 100 1968 Sedan |
|---|---|
| Length | 4638 mm |
| Width | 1730 mm |
| Height | 1425 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2675 mm |
| Weight | 1100 kg |
1968 Audi 100 dimensions are as follows:
In 1968 Audi 100 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 1968 Audi 100 dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.9 LS | 4638 mm / 1730 mm / 1425 mm | 30.72 Nm | 50 mm per 1 hp | 1.31 cc in 1 mm | 79 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.8 LS | 4638 mm / 1730 mm / 1425 mm | 28.63 Nm | 40 mm per 1 hp | 1.24 cc in 1 mm | 82 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.8 | 4590 mm / 1729 mm / 1421 mm | 32.32 Nm | 51 mm per 1 hp | 1.24 cc in 1 mm | 79 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.9 GL | 4625 mm / 1729 mm / 1421 mm | 28.91 Nm | 41 mm per 1 hp | 1.32 cc in 1 mm | 79 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.9 LS |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4638 mm / 1730 mm / 1425 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 30.72 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 50 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.31 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 79 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.8 LS |
| Length / width / height | 4638 mm / 1730 mm / 1425 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 28.63 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 40 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.24 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 82 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.8 |
| Length / width / height | 4590 mm / 1729 mm / 1421 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 32.32 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 51 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.24 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 79 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.9 GL |
| Length / width / height | 4625 mm / 1729 mm / 1421 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 28.91 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 41 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.32 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 79 mm to 1 mpg |