
| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90 1987 Sedan | 4403 mm | 1695 mm | 1397 mm | 2546 mm | 1320 kg |
| Body | 90 1987 Sedan |
|---|---|
| Length | 4403 mm |
| Width | 1695 mm |
| Height | 1397 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2546 mm |
| Weight | 1320 kg |
1987 Audi 90 dimensions are as follows:
In 1987 Audi 90 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 1987 Audi 90 dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.3 E 20V | 4393 mm / 1695 mm / 1372 mm | 19.97 Nm | 26 mm per 1 hp | 1.68 cc in 1 mm | 71 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 E CAT | 4393 mm / 1695 mm / 1397 mm | 25.54 Nm | 38 mm per 1 hp | 1.43 cc in 1 mm | 61 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.3 E CAT | 4393 mm / 1695 mm / 1397 mm | 23.12 Nm | 32 mm per 1 hp | 1.65 cc in 1 mm | 65 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.3 E | 4403 mm / 1695 mm / 1397 mm | 23.67 Nm | 33 mm per 1 hp | 1.65 cc in 1 mm | 63 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 E 20V | 4393 mm / 1695 mm / 1372 mm | 21.97 Nm | 27 mm per 1 hp | 1.45 cc in 1 mm | 71 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 E | 4393 mm / 1695 mm / 1397 mm | 25.54 Nm | 38 mm per 1 hp | 1.43 cc in 1 mm | 63 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.6 TD | 4393 mm / 1695 mm / 1397 mm | 28.34 Nm | 55 mm per 1 hp | 1.14 cc in 1 mm | 39 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.2 E | 4393 mm / 1695 mm / 1397 mm | 23.62 Nm | 32 mm per 1 hp | 1.59 cc in 1 mm | 71 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.3 E 20V |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4393 mm / 1695 mm / 1372 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 19.97 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 26 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.68 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 71 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 E CAT |
| Length / width / height | 4393 mm / 1695 mm / 1397 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.54 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 38 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.43 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 61 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.3 E CAT |
| Length / width / height | 4393 mm / 1695 mm / 1397 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 23.12 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 32 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.65 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 65 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.3 E |
| Length / width / height | 4403 mm / 1695 mm / 1397 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 23.67 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 33 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.65 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 63 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 E 20V |
| Length / width / height | 4393 mm / 1695 mm / 1372 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 21.97 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 27 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.45 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 71 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 E |
| Length / width / height | 4393 mm / 1695 mm / 1397 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.54 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 38 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.43 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 63 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.6 TD |
| Length / width / height | 4393 mm / 1695 mm / 1397 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 28.34 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 55 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.14 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 39 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 E |
| Length / width / height | 4393 mm / 1695 mm / 1397 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 23.62 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 32 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.59 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 71 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90 1984 Sedan | 4465 mm | 1682 mm | 1376 mm | 2538 mm | 1200 kg |
| Body | 90 1984 Sedan |
|---|---|
| Length | 4465 mm |
| Width | 1682 mm |
| Height | 1376 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2538 mm |
| Weight | 1200 kg |
1984 Audi 90 dimensions are as follows:
In 1984 Audi 90 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 1984 Audi 90 dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 | 4465 mm / 1682 mm / 1365 mm | 27.06 Nm | 40 mm per 1 hp | 1.46 cc in 1 mm | 62 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.2 E | 4465 mm / 1682 mm / 1376 mm | 24.01 Nm | 33 mm per 1 hp | 1.62 cc in 1 mm | 70 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 E | 4465 mm / 1682 mm / 1365 mm | 27.06 Nm | 39 mm per 1 hp | 1.46 cc in 1 mm | 62 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.2 CAT | 4465 mm / 1682 mm / 1376 mm | 26.26 Nm | 37 mm per 1 hp | 1.62 cc in 1 mm | 73 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4465 mm / 1682 mm / 1365 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 27.06 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 40 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.46 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 62 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 E |
| Length / width / height | 4465 mm / 1682 mm / 1376 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 24.01 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 33 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.62 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 70 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 E |
| Length / width / height | 4465 mm / 1682 mm / 1365 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 27.06 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 39 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.46 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 62 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 CAT |
| Length / width / height | 4465 mm / 1682 mm / 1376 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 26.26 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 37 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.62 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 73 mm to 1 mpg |