data macau serves not only as a place to view results but also as a reference source for lottery enthusiasts, as it is frequently analyzed by bettors to identify number patterns. This output archive is organized by draw date and time, allowing readers to carefully evaluate historical results and compare the most recent period with previous ones.
Each idn slot online platform has different policies, features, and terms and conditions. Users are advised to review the official rules and use the service responsibly in accordance with applicable regulations.

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTS 2014 Sedan | 5021 mm | 1833 mm | 1454 mm | 2910 mm | 1880 kg |
| Body | CTS 2014 Sedan |
|---|---|
| Length | 5021 mm |
| Width | 1833 mm |
| Height | 1454 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2910 mm |
| Weight | 1880 kg |
2014 Cadillac CTS dimensions are as follows:
In 2014 Cadillac CTS dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2014 Cadillac CTS dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 | 4966 mm / 1833 mm / 1454 mm | 12.42 Nm | 18 mm per 1 hp | 1.37 cc in 1 mm | - |
| V 6.2 V8 | 5021 mm / 1833 mm / 1454 mm | 5.87 Nm | 8 mm per 1 hp | 4.24 cc in 1 mm | - |
| 3.6 V6 | 4966 mm / 1833 mm / 1454 mm | 12.87 Nm | 15 mm per 1 hp | 2.51 cc in 1 mm | 73 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4966 mm / 1833 mm / 1454 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 12.42 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 18 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.37 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |
| Vehicle | V 6.2 V8 |
| Length / width / height | 5021 mm / 1833 mm / 1454 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 5.87 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 8 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 4.24 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |
| Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
| Length / width / height | 4966 mm / 1833 mm / 1454 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 12.87 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 15 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 2.51 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 73 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTS 2011 Coupe | 4789 mm | 1883 mm | 1422 mm | 2880 mm | 1930 kg |
| Body | CTS 2011 Coupe |
|---|---|
| Length | 4789 mm |
| Width | 1883 mm |
| Height | 1422 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2880 mm |
| Weight | 1930 kg |
2011 Cadillac CTS dimensions are as follows:
In 2011 Cadillac CTS dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2011 Cadillac CTS dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V 6.2 V8 | 4789 mm / 1883 mm / 1422 mm | 6.41 Nm | 8 mm per 1 hp | 4.33 cc in 1 mm | 135 mm to 1 mpg |
| 3.6 V6 | 4788 mm / 1882 mm / 1422 mm | 12.84 Nm | 15 mm per 1 hp | 2.51 cc in 1 mm | 86 mm to 1 mpg |
| 3.6 V6 VVT | 4789 mm / 1883 mm / 1422 mm | 12.94 Nm | 16 mm per 1 hp | 2.51 cc in 1 mm | - |
| Vehicle | V 6.2 V8 |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4789 mm / 1883 mm / 1422 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 6.41 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 8 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 4.33 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 135 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
| Length / width / height | 4788 mm / 1882 mm / 1422 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 12.84 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 15 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 2.51 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 86 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 3.6 V6 VVT |
| Length / width / height | 4789 mm / 1883 mm / 1422 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 12.94 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 16 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 2.51 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTS 2010 Station wagon (estate) | 4878 mm | 1842 mm | 1473 mm | 2880 mm | 2007 kg |
| Body | CTS 2010 Station wagon (estate) |
|---|---|
| Length | 4878 mm |
| Width | 1842 mm |
| Height | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2880 mm |
| Weight | 2007 kg |
2010 Cadillac CTS dimensions are as follows:
In 2010 Cadillac CTS dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2010 Cadillac CTS dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.0 V6 | 4878 mm / 1842 mm / 1473 mm | 16.15 Nm | 18 mm per 1 hp | 2.03 cc in 1 mm | 84 mm to 1 mpg |
| V 6.2 V8 | 4878 mm / 1842 mm / 1473 mm | 6.53 Nm | 9 mm per 1 hp | 4.18 cc in 1 mm | 115 mm to 1 mpg |
| 3.6 V6 | 4878 mm / 1842 mm / 1473 mm | 13.08 Nm | 15 mm per 1 hp | 2.42 cc in 1 mm | 88 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4878 mm / 1842 mm / 1473 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 16.15 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 18 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 2.03 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 84 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | V 6.2 V8 |
| Length / width / height | 4878 mm / 1842 mm / 1473 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 6.53 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 9 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 4.18 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 115 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
| Length / width / height | 4878 mm / 1842 mm / 1473 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 13.08 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 15 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 2.42 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 88 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTS 2008 Sedan | 4866 mm | 1842 mm | 1473 mm | 2880 mm | 1930 kg |
| Body | CTS 2008 Sedan |
|---|---|
| Length | 4866 mm |
| Width | 1842 mm |
| Height | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2880 mm |
| Weight | 1930 kg |
2008 Cadillac CTS dimensions are as follows:
In 2008 Cadillac CTS dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2008 Cadillac CTS dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.8L V6 SFI | 4829 mm / 1793 mm / 1440 mm | 19.63 Nm | 23 mm per 1 hp | 1.94 cc in 1 mm | - |
| 3.6L V6 SIDI | 4829 mm / 1793 mm / 1440 mm | 12.91 Nm | 16 mm per 1 hp | 2.48 cc in 1 mm | 85 mm to 1 mpg |
| 3.0 V6 | 4866 mm / 1842 mm / 1472 mm | 16.11 Nm | 18 mm per 1 hp | 2.03 cc in 1 mm | 84 mm to 1 mpg |
| V 6.2 V8 | 4859 mm / 1842 mm / 1473 mm | 6.5 Nm | 9 mm per 1 hp | 4.18 cc in 1 mm | 115 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.8L V6 SFI |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4829 mm / 1793 mm / 1440 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 19.63 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 23 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.94 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |
| Vehicle | 3.6L V6 SIDI |
| Length / width / height | 4829 mm / 1793 mm / 1440 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 12.91 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 16 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 2.48 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 85 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
| Length / width / height | 4866 mm / 1842 mm / 1472 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 16.11 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 18 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 2.03 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 84 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | V 6.2 V8 |
| Length / width / height | 4859 mm / 1842 mm / 1473 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 6.5 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 9 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 4.18 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 115 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTS 2003 Sedan | 4865 mm | 1795 mm | 1455 mm | 2880 mm | 1780 kg |
| Body | CTS 2003 Sedan |
|---|---|
| Length | 4865 mm |
| Width | 1795 mm |
| Height | 1455 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2880 mm |
| Weight | 1780 kg |
2003 Cadillac CTS dimensions are as follows:
In 2003 Cadillac CTS dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2003 Cadillac CTS dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.2i V6 24V | 4828 mm / 1793 mm / 1440 mm | 16.31 Nm | 22 mm per 1 hp | 2.2 cc in 1 mm | 85 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.6i V6 24V L | 4828 mm / 1795 mm / 1441 mm | 19.71 Nm | 27 mm per 1 hp | 1.8 cc in 1 mm | 78 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.8i V6 24V | 4828 mm / 1795 mm / 1441 mm | 18.43 Nm | 22 mm per 1 hp | 1.94 cc in 1 mm | - |
| 3.6i V6 24V | 4828 mm / 1793 mm / 1440 mm | 13.95 Nm | 19 mm per 1 hp | 2.48 cc in 1 mm | - |
| V 5.7 i V8 | 4865 mm / 1793 mm / 1455 mm | 9.08 Nm | 12 mm per 1 hp | 3.89 cc in 1 mm | - |
| V 6.0 i V8 | 4864 mm / 1793 mm / 1455 mm | 9.07 Nm | 12 mm per 1 hp | 4.1 cc in 1 mm | - |
| Vehicle | 3.2i V6 24V |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4828 mm / 1793 mm / 1440 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 16.31 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 22 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 2.2 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 85 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.6i V6 24V L |
| Length / width / height | 4828 mm / 1795 mm / 1441 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 19.71 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 27 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.8 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 78 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.8i V6 24V |
| Length / width / height | 4828 mm / 1795 mm / 1441 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 18.43 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 22 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.94 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |
| Vehicle | 3.6i V6 24V |
| Length / width / height | 4828 mm / 1793 mm / 1440 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 13.95 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 19 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 2.48 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |
| Vehicle | V 5.7 i V8 |
| Length / width / height | 4865 mm / 1793 mm / 1455 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 9.08 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 12 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 3.89 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |
| Vehicle | V 6.0 i V8 |
| Length / width / height | 4864 mm / 1793 mm / 1455 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 9.07 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 12 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 4.1 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |