Nirwanapoker is one of Indonesia's leading online poker platform. As the official provider of IDNPoker games, they offer stable tables, fast transactions, and multi-layered security. Enjoy a fair gaming experience with an active community, competitive sign-up bonuses, and responsive customer service. Register now and experience the best, consistent, and trusted poker experience designed for both serious and novice players.
Data macau serves not only as a place to view results but also as a reference source for lottery enthusiasts, as it is frequently analyzed by bettors to identify number patterns. This output archive is organized by draw date and time, allowing readers to carefully evaluate historical results and compare the most recent period with previous ones.
If you are looking for professional logistics solutions with dependable refrigerated transportation services, United World Transportation is an excellent choice to support your business distribution needs. With more than 20 years of experience in the third-party logistics and transportation industry, UWT provides fast, secure, and efficient shipping services for various types of cargo, including frozen goods and fresh food products.
Each idnslot platform website has different policies, features, and terms and conditions. Users are advised to review the official rules and use the service responsibly in accordance with applicable regulations.
sunfloromash.com is a Ukrainian machine-building company specializing in the production of premium agricultural harvesting equipment. The company focuses on innovative and cost-effective farming machinery designed to improve harvesting efficiency while reducing crop losses. Their product lineup includes corn headers, sunflower headers, grain headers, header trailers, and agricultural transport solutions built for heavy-duty farming conditions.

Mondeo Hatchback IV

Mondeo Sedan IV

Mondeo Wagon IV

Mondeo Hatchback III (facelift 2010)

Mondeo Wagon III (facelift 2010)

Mondeo Wagon III

Mondeo Hatchback III

Mondeo Sedan III

Mondeo Hatchback II

Mondeo Wagon II

Mondeo Sedan II

Mondeo Seadn I (facelift 1996)

Mondeo Wagon I (facelift 1996)

Mondeo Hatchback I (facelift 1996)

Mondeo Hatchback I

Mondeo Wagon I

Mondeo Sedan I

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mondeo 2015 Hatchback | 4871 mm | 1852 mm | 1482 mm | 2850 mm | 1564 kg |
| Body | Mondeo 2015 Hatchback |
|---|---|
| Length | 4871 mm |
| Width | 1852 mm |
| Height | 1482 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2850 mm |
| Weight | 1564 kg |
2015 Ford Mondeo dimensions are as follows:
In 2015 Ford Mondeo dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2015 Ford Mondeo dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 TDCi | 4871 mm / 1852 mm / 1482 mm | 10.82 Nm | 23 mm per 1 hp | 1.35 cc in 1 mm | 38 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.0 EcoBoost | 4871 mm / 1852 mm / 1482 mm | 28.65 Nm | 39 mm per 1 hp | 0.67 cc in 1 mm | 40 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.6 TDCi | 4871 mm / 1852 mm / 1482 mm | 18.04 Nm | 42 mm per 1 hp | 1.05 cc in 1 mm | 33 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.5 EcoBoost | 4871 mm / 1852 mm / 1482 mm | 20.3 Nm | 30 mm per 1 hp | 1.01 cc in 1 mm | 50 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 EcoBoost | 4871 mm / 1852 mm / 1482 mm | 14.12 Nm | 20 mm per 1 hp | 1.35 cc in 1 mm | 58 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.5 TDCi | 4871 mm / 1852 mm / 1482 mm | 18.04 Nm | 41 mm per 1 hp | 1.01 cc in 1 mm | 31 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4871 mm / 1852 mm / 1482 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 10.82 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 23 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.35 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 38 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.0 EcoBoost |
| Length / width / height | 4871 mm / 1852 mm / 1482 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 28.65 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 39 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 0.67 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 40 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.6 TDCi |
| Length / width / height | 4871 mm / 1852 mm / 1482 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 18.04 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 42 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.05 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 33 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
| Length / width / height | 4871 mm / 1852 mm / 1482 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 20.3 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 30 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.01 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 50 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBoost |
| Length / width / height | 4871 mm / 1852 mm / 1482 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 14.12 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 20 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.35 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 58 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.5 TDCi |
| Length / width / height | 4871 mm / 1852 mm / 1482 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 18.04 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 41 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.01 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 31 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mondeo 2015 Sedan | 4871 mm | 1852 mm | 1501 mm | 2850 mm | 1562 kg |
| Body | Mondeo 2015 Sedan |
|---|---|
| Length | 4871 mm |
| Width | 1852 mm |
| Height | 1501 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2850 mm |
| Weight | 1562 kg |
2015 Ford Mondeo dimensions are as follows:
In 2015 Ford Mondeo dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2015 Ford Mondeo dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 EcoBoost | 4871 mm / 1852 mm / 1482 mm | 28.65 Nm | 39 mm per 1 hp | 0.67 cc in 1 mm | 40 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.5 EcoBoost | 4871 mm / 1852 mm / 1482 mm | 20.3 Nm | 30 mm per 1 hp | 1.01 cc in 1 mm | 50 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.6 TDCi | 4871 mm / 1852 mm / 1482 mm | 18.04 Nm | 42 mm per 1 hp | 1.05 cc in 1 mm | 33 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 TDCi | 4871 mm / 1852 mm / 1482 mm | 10.82 Nm | 23 mm per 1 hp | 1.35 cc in 1 mm | 38 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 EcoBoost | 4871 mm / 1852 mm / 1482 mm | 14.12 Nm | 24 mm per 1 hp | 1.35 cc in 1 mm | 58 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 iVCT | 4867 mm / 1852 mm / 1501 mm | - | 26 mm per 1 hp | 1.33 cc in 1 mm | 33 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.5 TDCi | 4871 mm / 1852 mm / 1482 mm | 18.04 Nm | 41 mm per 1 hp | 1.01 cc in 1 mm | 31 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4871 mm / 1852 mm / 1482 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 28.65 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 39 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 0.67 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 40 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
| Length / width / height | 4871 mm / 1852 mm / 1482 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 20.3 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 30 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.01 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 50 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.6 TDCi |
| Length / width / height | 4871 mm / 1852 mm / 1482 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 18.04 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 42 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.05 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 33 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
| Length / width / height | 4871 mm / 1852 mm / 1482 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 10.82 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 23 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.35 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 38 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBoost |
| Length / width / height | 4871 mm / 1852 mm / 1482 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 14.12 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 24 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.35 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 58 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 iVCT |
| Length / width / height | 4867 mm / 1852 mm / 1501 mm |
| Length to width ratio | - |
| Length per 1 hp | 26 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.33 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 33 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.5 TDCi |
| Length / width / height | 4871 mm / 1852 mm / 1482 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 18.04 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 41 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.01 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 31 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mondeo 2015 Station wagon (estate) | 4867 mm | 1852 mm | 1501 mm | 2850 mm | 1584 kg |
| Body | Mondeo 2015 Station wagon (estate) |
|---|---|
| Length | 4867 mm |
| Width | 1852 mm |
| Height | 1501 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2850 mm |
| Weight | 1584 kg |
2015 Ford Mondeo dimensions are as follows:
In 2015 Ford Mondeo dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2015 Ford Mondeo dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.5 EcoBoost | 4867 mm / 1852 mm / 1501 mm | 20.28 Nm | 30 mm per 1 hp | 1 cc in 1 mm | 51 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.6 TDCi | 4867 mm / 1852 mm / 1501 mm | 18.03 Nm | 42 mm per 1 hp | 1.04 cc in 1 mm | 34 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.0 EcoBoost | 4867 mm / 1852 mm / 1501 mm | 28.63 Nm | 39 mm per 1 hp | 0.66 cc in 1 mm | 41 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 TDCi | 4867 mm / 1852 mm / 1501 mm | 10.82 Nm | 23 mm per 1 hp | 1.33 cc in 1 mm | 39 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 EcoBoost | 4867 mm / 1852 mm / 1501 mm | 14.11 Nm | 20 mm per 1 hp | 1.33 cc in 1 mm | 60 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.5 TDCi | 4867 mm / 1852 mm / 1501 mm | 18.03 Nm | 41 mm per 1 hp | 1 cc in 1 mm | 32 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4867 mm / 1852 mm / 1501 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 20.28 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 30 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 51 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.6 TDCi |
| Length / width / height | 4867 mm / 1852 mm / 1501 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 18.03 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 42 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.04 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 34 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.0 EcoBoost |
| Length / width / height | 4867 mm / 1852 mm / 1501 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 28.63 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 39 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 0.66 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 41 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
| Length / width / height | 4867 mm / 1852 mm / 1501 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 10.82 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 23 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.33 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 39 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBoost |
| Length / width / height | 4867 mm / 1852 mm / 1501 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 14.11 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 20 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.33 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 60 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.5 TDCi |
| Length / width / height | 4867 mm / 1852 mm / 1501 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 18.03 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 41 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 32 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mondeo 2010 Hatchback | 4784 mm | 1886 mm | 1500 mm | 2850 mm | 1599 kg |
| Body | Mondeo 2010 Hatchback |
|---|---|
| Length | 4784 mm |
| Width | 1886 mm |
| Height | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2850 mm |
| Weight | 1599 kg |
2010 Ford Mondeo dimensions are as follows:
In 2010 Ford Mondeo dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2010 Ford Mondeo dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 EcoBoost | 4784 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm | 14.07 Nm | 20 mm per 1 hp | 1.33 cc in 1 mm | 61 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.6 16V | 4784 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm | 29.9 Nm | 40 mm per 1 hp | 1.06 cc in 1 mm | 54 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 TDCI | 4784 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm | 14.07 Nm | 29 mm per 1 hp | 1.33 cc in 1 mm | 45 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 16V | 4784 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm | 25.18 Nm | 33 mm per 1 hp | 1.33 cc in 1 mm | 63 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.2 TDCI | 4784 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm | 11.39 Nm | 24 mm per 1 hp | 1.45 cc in 1 mm | 48 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4784 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 14.07 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 20 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.33 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 61 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
| Length / width / height | 4784 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 29.9 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 40 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.06 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 54 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 TDCI |
| Length / width / height | 4784 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 14.07 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 29 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.33 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 45 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
| Length / width / height | 4784 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.18 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 33 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.33 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 63 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 TDCI |
| Length / width / height | 4784 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 11.39 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 24 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.45 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 48 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mondeo 2010 Station wagon (estate) | 4837 mm | 1886 mm | 1512 mm | 2850 mm | 1615 kg |
| Body | Mondeo 2010 Station wagon (estate) |
|---|---|
| Length | 4837 mm |
| Width | 1886 mm |
| Height | 1512 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2850 mm |
| Weight | 1615 kg |
2010 Ford Mondeo dimensions are as follows:
In 2010 Ford Mondeo dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2010 Ford Mondeo dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 EcoBoost | 4837 mm / 1886 mm / 1512 mm | 14.23 Nm | 20 mm per 1 hp | 1.32 cc in 1 mm | 61 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 TDCI | 4837 mm / 1886 mm / 1512 mm | 15.12 Nm | 35 mm per 1 hp | 1.32 cc in 1 mm | 45 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.6 16V | 4837 mm / 1886 mm / 1512 mm | 30.23 Nm | 40 mm per 1 hp | 1.06 cc in 1 mm | 54 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 16V | 4837 mm / 1886 mm / 1512 mm | 25.46 Nm | 33 mm per 1 hp | 1.32 cc in 1 mm | 63 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.2 TDCI | 4837 mm / 1886 mm / 1512 mm | 11.52 Nm | 24 mm per 1 hp | 1.44 cc in 1 mm | 48 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4837 mm / 1886 mm / 1512 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 14.23 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 20 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.32 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 61 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 TDCI |
| Length / width / height | 4837 mm / 1886 mm / 1512 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 15.12 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 35 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.32 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 45 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
| Length / width / height | 4837 mm / 1886 mm / 1512 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 30.23 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 40 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.06 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 54 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
| Length / width / height | 4837 mm / 1886 mm / 1512 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.46 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 33 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.32 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 63 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 TDCI |
| Length / width / height | 4837 mm / 1886 mm / 1512 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 11.52 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 24 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.44 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 48 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mondeo 2007 Station wagon (estate) | 4844 mm | 1886 mm | 1500 mm | 2850 mm | 1492 kg |
| Body | Mondeo 2007 Station wagon (estate) |
|---|---|
| Length | 4844 mm |
| Width | 1886 mm |
| Height | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2850 mm |
| Weight | 1492 kg |
2007 Ford Mondeo dimensions are as follows:
In 2007 Ford Mondeo dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2007 Ford Mondeo dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.6 i 16V | 4830 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm | 30.19 Nm | 39 mm per 1 hp | 1.06 cc in 1 mm | 59 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 TDCi | 4844 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm | 15.14 Nm | 35 mm per 1 hp | 1.33 cc in 1 mm | 47 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 i 16V | 4830 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm | 25.42 Nm | 33 mm per 1 hp | 1.33 cc in 1 mm | 63 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.2 TDCi | 4844 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm | 12.11 Nm | 28 mm per 1 hp | 1.45 cc in 1 mm | 50 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.3 i 16V | 4830 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm | 23.22 Nm | 30 mm per 1 hp | 1.51 cc in 1 mm | 75 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.5 i 20V | 4830 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm | 15.09 Nm | 22 mm per 1 hp | 1.68 cc in 1 mm | 75 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4830 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 30.19 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 39 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.06 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 59 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
| Length / width / height | 4844 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 15.14 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 35 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.33 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 47 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
| Length / width / height | 4830 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.42 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 33 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.33 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 63 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
| Length / width / height | 4844 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 12.11 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 28 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.45 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 50 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.3 i 16V |
| Length / width / height | 4830 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 23.22 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 30 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.51 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 75 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.5 i 20V |
| Length / width / height | 4830 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 15.09 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 22 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.68 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 75 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mondeo 2007 Hatchback | 4778 mm | 1886 mm | 1500 mm | 2850 mm | 1503 kg |
| Body | Mondeo 2007 Hatchback |
|---|---|
| Length | 4778 mm |
| Width | 1886 mm |
| Height | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2850 mm |
| Weight | 1503 kg |
2007 Ford Mondeo dimensions are as follows:
In 2007 Ford Mondeo dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2007 Ford Mondeo dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.6 i 16V | 4778 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm | 34.62 Nm | 43 mm per 1 hp | 1.07 cc in 1 mm | 57 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 i 16V | 4778 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm | 25.15 Nm | 33 mm per 1 hp | 1.33 cc in 1 mm | 63 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 TDCi | 4778 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm | 14.93 Nm | 37 mm per 1 hp | 1.33 cc in 1 mm | 57 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.6i 16v | 4778 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm | 29.86 Nm | 38 mm per 1 hp | 1.06 cc in 1 mm | 59 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.2 TDCi | 4778 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm | 11.95 Nm | 27 mm per 1 hp | 1.45 cc in 1 mm | 50 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.5 i 20V | 4778 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm | 14.93 Nm | 22 mm per 1 hp | 1.68 cc in 1 mm | 75 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.3 i 16V | 4778 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm | 22.97 Nm | 30 mm per 1 hp | 1.51 cc in 1 mm | 75 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4778 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 34.62 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 43 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.07 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 57 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
| Length / width / height | 4778 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.15 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 33 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.33 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 63 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
| Length / width / height | 4778 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 14.93 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 37 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.33 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 57 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.6i 16v |
| Length / width / height | 4778 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 29.86 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 38 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.06 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 59 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
| Length / width / height | 4778 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 11.95 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 27 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.45 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 50 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.5 i 20V |
| Length / width / height | 4778 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 14.93 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 22 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.68 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 75 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.3 i 16V |
| Length / width / height | 4778 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 22.97 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 30 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.51 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 75 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mondeo 2006 Sedan | 4844 mm | 1886 mm | 1500 mm | 2850 mm | 1503 kg |
| Body | Mondeo 2006 Sedan |
|---|---|
| Length | 4844 mm |
| Width | 1886 mm |
| Height | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2850 mm |
| Weight | 1503 kg |
2006 Ford Mondeo dimensions are as follows:
In 2006 Ford Mondeo dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2006 Ford Mondeo dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.6 i 16V | 4844 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm | 30.28 Nm | 39 mm per 1 hp | 1.06 cc in 1 mm | 59 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.8 TDCi | 4844 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm | 14.25 Nm | 39 mm per 1 hp | 1.17 cc in 1 mm | 46 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 TDCi | 4844 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm | 15.14 Nm | 35 mm per 1 hp | 1.33 cc in 1 mm | 47 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 i 16V | 4844 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm | 25.49 Nm | 33 mm per 1 hp | 1.33 cc in 1 mm | 63 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.2 TDCi | 4844 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm | 12.11 Nm | 28 mm per 1 hp | 1.45 cc in 1 mm | 50 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.3 i 16V | 4844 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm | 23.29 Nm | 30 mm per 1 hp | 1.51 cc in 1 mm | 75 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.5 i 20V | 4844 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm | 15.14 Nm | 22 mm per 1 hp | 1.68 cc in 1 mm | 75 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4844 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 30.28 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 39 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.06 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 59 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.8 TDCi |
| Length / width / height | 4844 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 14.25 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 39 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.17 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 46 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
| Length / width / height | 4844 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 15.14 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 35 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.33 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 47 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
| Length / width / height | 4844 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.49 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 33 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.33 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 63 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
| Length / width / height | 4844 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 12.11 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 28 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.45 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 50 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.3 i 16V |
| Length / width / height | 4844 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 23.29 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 30 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.51 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 75 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.5 i 20V |
| Length / width / height | 4844 mm / 1886 mm / 1500 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 15.14 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 22 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.68 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 75 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mondeo 2003 Hatchback | 4731 mm | 1812 mm | 1429 mm | 2754 mm | 1498 kg |
| Body | Mondeo 2003 Hatchback |
|---|---|
| Length | 4731 mm |
| Width | 1812 mm |
| Height | 1429 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2754 mm |
| Weight | 1498 kg |
2003 Ford Mondeo dimensions are as follows:
In 2003 Ford Mondeo dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2003 Ford Mondeo dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 V6 | 4731 mm / 1812 mm / 1429 mm | 21.5 Nm | 28 mm per 1 hp | 1.75 cc in 1 mm | 76 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 16V | 4731 mm / 1812 mm / 1429 mm | 24.9 Nm | 33 mm per 1 hp | 1.4 cc in 1 mm | 62 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 DI | 4731 mm / 1812 mm / 1429 mm | 16.9 Nm | 41 mm per 1 hp | 1.4 cc in 1 mm | 45 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 TDCi | 4731 mm / 1812 mm / 1429 mm | 14.34 Nm | 36 mm per 1 hp | 1.4 cc in 1 mm | 46 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.8 16V | 4731 mm / 1812 mm / 1429 mm | 27.83 Nm | 36 mm per 1 hp | 1.26 cc in 1 mm | 60 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.2 TDCi | 4731 mm / 1812 mm / 1429 mm | 13.14 Nm | 31 mm per 1 hp | 1.54 cc in 1 mm | - |
| 3.0 i V6 24V | 4731 mm / 1812 mm / 1429 mm | 16.9 Nm | 23 mm per 1 hp | 2.08 cc in 1 mm | - |
| Vehicle | 2.5 V6 |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4731 mm / 1812 mm / 1429 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 21.5 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 28 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.75 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 76 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
| Length / width / height | 4731 mm / 1812 mm / 1429 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 24.9 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 33 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.4 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 62 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 DI |
| Length / width / height | 4731 mm / 1812 mm / 1429 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 16.9 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 41 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.4 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 45 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
| Length / width / height | 4731 mm / 1812 mm / 1429 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 14.34 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 36 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.4 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 46 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
| Length / width / height | 4731 mm / 1812 mm / 1429 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 27.83 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 36 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.26 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 60 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
| Length / width / height | 4731 mm / 1812 mm / 1429 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 13.14 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 31 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.54 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |
| Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V |
| Length / width / height | 4731 mm / 1812 mm / 1429 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 16.9 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 23 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 2.08 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mondeo 2002 Station wagon (estate) | 4804 mm | 1812 mm | 1441 mm | 2754 mm | 1545 kg |
| Body | Mondeo 2002 Station wagon (estate) |
|---|---|
| Length | 4804 mm |
| Width | 1812 mm |
| Height | 1441 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2754 mm |
| Weight | 1545 kg |
2002 Ford Mondeo dimensions are as follows:
In 2002 Ford Mondeo dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2002 Ford Mondeo dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 16V | 4804 mm / 1812 mm / 1441 mm | 25.28 Nm | 33 mm per 1 hp | 1.39 cc in 1 mm | 62 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 DI | 4804 mm / 1812 mm / 1441 mm | 19.61 Nm | 53 mm per 1 hp | 1.39 cc in 1 mm | 45 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 TDCi | 4804 mm / 1812 mm / 1441 mm | 14.56 Nm | 37 mm per 1 hp | 1.39 cc in 1 mm | 48 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.5 V6 | 4804 mm / 1812 mm / 1441 mm | 21.84 Nm | 28 mm per 1 hp | 1.73 cc in 1 mm | 76 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.8 16V | 4804 mm / 1812 mm / 1441 mm | 28.26 Nm | 38 mm per 1 hp | 1.25 cc in 1 mm | 62 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.2 TDCi | 4804 mm / 1812 mm / 1441 mm | 13.34 Nm | 31 mm per 1 hp | 1.53 cc in 1 mm | - |
| 3.0 i V6 24V | 4804 mm / 1812 mm / 1441 mm | 17.16 Nm | 24 mm per 1 hp | 2.06 cc in 1 mm | - |
| 3.0 V6 24V ST220 | 4804 mm / 1812 mm / 1441 mm | 17.79 Nm | 21 mm per 1 hp | 2.06 cc in 1 mm | 82 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4804 mm / 1812 mm / 1441 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.28 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 33 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.39 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 62 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 DI |
| Length / width / height | 4804 mm / 1812 mm / 1441 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 19.61 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 53 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.39 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 45 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
| Length / width / height | 4804 mm / 1812 mm / 1441 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 14.56 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 37 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.39 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 48 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.5 V6 |
| Length / width / height | 4804 mm / 1812 mm / 1441 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 21.84 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 28 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.73 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 76 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
| Length / width / height | 4804 mm / 1812 mm / 1441 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 28.26 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 38 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.25 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 62 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
| Length / width / height | 4804 mm / 1812 mm / 1441 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 13.34 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 31 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.53 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |
| Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V |
| Length / width / height | 4804 mm / 1812 mm / 1441 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 17.16 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 24 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 2.06 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |
| Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V ST220 |
| Length / width / height | 4804 mm / 1812 mm / 1441 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 17.79 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 21 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 2.06 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 82 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mondeo 2002 Sedan | 4731 mm | 1812 mm | 1429 mm | 2754 mm | 1492 kg |
| Body | Mondeo 2002 Sedan |
|---|---|
| Length | 4731 mm |
| Width | 1812 mm |
| Height | 1429 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2754 mm |
| Weight | 1492 kg |
2002 Ford Mondeo dimensions are as follows:
In 2002 Ford Mondeo dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2002 Ford Mondeo dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 DI | 4731 mm / 1812 mm / 1429 mm | 19.31 Nm | 53 mm per 1 hp | 1.4 cc in 1 mm | 45 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 | 4731 mm / 1812 mm / 1429 mm | 24.9 Nm | 33 mm per 1 hp | 1.4 cc in 1 mm | 62 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 TDCi | 4731 mm / 1812 mm / 1429 mm | 14.34 Nm | 36 mm per 1 hp | 1.4 cc in 1 mm | 46 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.5 | 4731 mm / 1812 mm / 1429 mm | 21.5 Nm | 28 mm per 1 hp | 1.75 cc in 1 mm | 76 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.8 | 4731 mm / 1812 mm / 1429 mm | 27.83 Nm | 38 mm per 1 hp | 1.26 cc in 1 mm | 60 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.8 i 16V Duratec SCi | 4731 mm / 1812 mm / 1429 mm | 27.03 Nm | 36 mm per 1 hp | 1.26 cc in 1 mm | 55 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.2 TDCi | 4731 mm / 1812 mm / 1429 mm | 13.14 Nm | 31 mm per 1 hp | 1.54 cc in 1 mm | - |
| 3.0 i V6 24V | 4731 mm / 1812 mm / 1429 mm | 16.9 Nm | 23 mm per 1 hp | 2.08 cc in 1 mm | - |
| 3.0 V6 24V ST220 | 4731 mm / 1812 mm / 1429 mm | 17.52 Nm | 21 mm per 1 hp | 2.08 cc in 1 mm | 79 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 DI |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4731 mm / 1812 mm / 1429 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 19.31 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 53 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.4 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 45 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 |
| Length / width / height | 4731 mm / 1812 mm / 1429 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 24.9 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 33 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.4 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 62 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
| Length / width / height | 4731 mm / 1812 mm / 1429 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 14.34 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 36 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.4 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 46 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.5 |
| Length / width / height | 4731 mm / 1812 mm / 1429 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 21.5 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 28 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.75 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 76 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.8 |
| Length / width / height | 4731 mm / 1812 mm / 1429 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 27.83 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 38 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.26 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 60 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V Duratec SCi |
| Length / width / height | 4731 mm / 1812 mm / 1429 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 27.03 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 36 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.26 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 55 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
| Length / width / height | 4731 mm / 1812 mm / 1429 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 13.14 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 31 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.54 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |
| Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V |
| Length / width / height | 4731 mm / 1812 mm / 1429 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 16.9 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 23 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 2.08 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |
| Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V ST220 |
| Length / width / height | 4731 mm / 1812 mm / 1429 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 17.52 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 21 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 2.08 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 79 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mondeo 1999 Sedan | 4556 mm | 1751 mm | 1430 mm | 2705 mm | 1359 kg |
| Body | Mondeo 1999 Sedan |
|---|---|
| Length | 4556 mm |
| Width | 1751 mm |
| Height | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2705 mm |
| Weight | 1359 kg |
1999 Ford Mondeo dimensions are as follows:
In 1999 Ford Mondeo dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 1999 Ford Mondeo dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0i | 4556 mm / 1751 mm / 1424 mm | 25.6 Nm | 35 mm per 1 hp | 1.4 cc in 1 mm | - |
| 1.6 i 16V | 4556 mm / 1751 mm / 1424 mm | 32.08 Nm | 48 mm per 1 hp | 1.12 cc in 1 mm | - |
| 1.8 TD | 4556 mm / 1751 mm / 1427 mm | 25.31 Nm | 51 mm per 1 hp | 1.23 cc in 1 mm | 47 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.5i V6 | 4556 mm / 1751 mm / 1424 mm | 20.71 Nm | 27 mm per 1 hp | 1.79 cc in 1 mm | - |
| 1.8 16V | 4480 mm / 1750 mm / 1430 mm | 28 Nm | 39 mm per 1 hp | 1.26 cc in 1 mm | 50 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.5 ST 200 | 4556 mm / 1751 mm / 1424 mm | 19.47 Nm | 22 mm per 1 hp | 1.75 cc in 1 mm | - |
| Vehicle | 2.0i |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4556 mm / 1751 mm / 1424 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.6 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 35 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.4 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |
| Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
| Length / width / height | 4556 mm / 1751 mm / 1424 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 32.08 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 48 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.12 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |
| Vehicle | 1.8 TD |
| Length / width / height | 4556 mm / 1751 mm / 1427 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.31 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 51 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.23 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 47 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.5i V6 |
| Length / width / height | 4556 mm / 1751 mm / 1424 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 20.71 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 27 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.79 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |
| Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
| Length / width / height | 4480 mm / 1750 mm / 1430 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 28 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 39 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.26 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 50 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.5 ST 200 |
| Length / width / height | 4556 mm / 1751 mm / 1424 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 19.47 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 22 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.75 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mondeo 1999 Station wagon (estate) | 4671 mm | 1751 mm | 1510 mm | 2704 mm | 1416 kg |
| Body | Mondeo 1999 Station wagon (estate) |
|---|---|
| Length | 4671 mm |
| Width | 1751 mm |
| Height | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2704 mm |
| Weight | 1416 kg |
1999 Ford Mondeo dimensions are as follows:
In 1999 Ford Mondeo dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 1999 Ford Mondeo dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0i | 4671 mm / 1751 mm / 1510 mm | 26.54 Nm | 36 mm per 1 hp | 1.32 cc in 1 mm | - |
| 1.6i 16V | 4671 mm / 1751 mm / 1480 mm | 32.89 Nm | 49 mm per 1 hp | 1.08 cc in 1 mm | - |
| 1.8i 16V | 4671 mm / 1751 mm / 1510 mm | 29.19 Nm | 41 mm per 1 hp | 1.19 cc in 1 mm | - |
| 1.8 TD | 4671 mm / 1751 mm / 1510 mm | 25.95 Nm | 52 mm per 1 hp | 1.16 cc in 1 mm | 50 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.5 ST 200 | 4671 mm / 1751 mm / 1480 mm | 19.96 Nm | 23 mm per 1 hp | 1.69 cc in 1 mm | - |
| Vehicle | 2.0i |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4671 mm / 1751 mm / 1510 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 26.54 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 36 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.32 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |
| Vehicle | 1.6i 16V |
| Length / width / height | 4671 mm / 1751 mm / 1480 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 32.89 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 49 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.08 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |
| Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
| Length / width / height | 4671 mm / 1751 mm / 1510 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 29.19 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 41 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.19 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |
| Vehicle | 1.8 TD |
| Length / width / height | 4671 mm / 1751 mm / 1510 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.95 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 52 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.16 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 50 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.5 ST 200 |
| Length / width / height | 4671 mm / 1751 mm / 1480 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 19.96 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 23 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.69 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mondeo 1999 Hatchback | 4556 mm | 1751 mm | 1427 mm | 2704 mm | 1371 kg |
| Body | Mondeo 1999 Hatchback |
|---|---|
| Length | 4556 mm |
| Width | 1751 mm |
| Height | 1427 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2704 mm |
| Weight | 1371 kg |
1999 Ford Mondeo dimensions are as follows:
In 1999 Ford Mondeo dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 1999 Ford Mondeo dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.8i 16V | 4556 mm / 1751 mm / 1427 mm | 28.48 Nm | 40 mm per 1 hp | 1.26 cc in 1 mm | - |
| 1.6 16V | 4556 mm / 1751 mm / 1424 mm | 32.08 Nm | 48 mm per 1 hp | 1.12 cc in 1 mm | - |
| 1.8 TD | 4556 mm / 1751 mm / 1427 mm | 25.31 Nm | 51 mm per 1 hp | 1.23 cc in 1 mm | 47 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0i | 4556 mm / 1751 mm / 1427 mm | 25.89 Nm | 35 mm per 1 hp | 1.39 cc in 1 mm | - |
| 2.5 ST 200 | 4556 mm / 1751 mm / 1424 mm | 19.47 Nm | 22 mm per 1 hp | 1.75 cc in 1 mm | - |
| Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4556 mm / 1751 mm / 1427 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 28.48 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 40 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.26 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |
| Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
| Length / width / height | 4556 mm / 1751 mm / 1424 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 32.08 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 48 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.12 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |
| Vehicle | 1.8 TD |
| Length / width / height | 4556 mm / 1751 mm / 1427 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.31 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 51 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.23 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 47 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0i |
| Length / width / height | 4556 mm / 1751 mm / 1427 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.89 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 35 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.39 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |
| Vehicle | 2.5 ST 200 |
| Length / width / height | 4556 mm / 1751 mm / 1424 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 19.47 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 22 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.75 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mondeo 1994 Hatchback | 4481 mm | 1749 mm | 1424 mm | 2704 mm | 1370 kg |
| Body | Mondeo 1994 Hatchback |
|---|---|
| Length | 4481 mm |
| Width | 1749 mm |
| Height | 1424 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2704 mm |
| Weight | 1370 kg |
1994 Ford Mondeo dimensions are as follows:
In 1994 Ford Mondeo dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 1994 Ford Mondeo dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.6 i 16V | 4481 mm / 1749 mm / 1424 mm | 33.44 Nm | 50 mm per 1 hp | 1.12 cc in 1 mm | 53 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.8i 16V | 4481 mm / 1749 mm / 1424 mm | 28.36 Nm | 40 mm per 1 hp | 1.26 cc in 1 mm | 56 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 i 16V 4x4 | 4481 mm / 1749 mm / 1424 mm | 24.89 Nm | 33 mm per 1 hp | 1.4 cc in 1 mm | 65 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.8 TD | 4481 mm / 1749 mm / 1424 mm | 25.17 Nm | 51 mm per 1 hp | 1.23 cc in 1 mm | 45 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 i 16V | 4481 mm / 1749 mm / 1424 mm | 24.89 Nm | 33 mm per 1 hp | 1.4 cc in 1 mm | 73 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.5i 24V | 4481 mm / 1749 mm / 1424 mm | 20.37 Nm | 26 mm per 1 hp | 1.79 cc in 1 mm | 70 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4481 mm / 1749 mm / 1424 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 33.44 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 50 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.12 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 53 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
| Length / width / height | 4481 mm / 1749 mm / 1424 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 28.36 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 40 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.26 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 56 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V 4x4 |
| Length / width / height | 4481 mm / 1749 mm / 1424 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 24.89 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 33 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.4 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 65 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.8 TD |
| Length / width / height | 4481 mm / 1749 mm / 1424 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.17 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 51 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.23 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 45 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
| Length / width / height | 4481 mm / 1749 mm / 1424 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 24.89 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 33 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.4 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 73 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.5i 24V |
| Length / width / height | 4481 mm / 1749 mm / 1424 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 20.37 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 26 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.79 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 70 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mondeo 1994 Station wagon (estate) | 4631 mm | 1749 mm | 1442 mm | 2704 mm | 1442 kg |
| Body | Mondeo 1994 Station wagon (estate) |
|---|---|
| Length | 4631 mm |
| Width | 1749 mm |
| Height | 1442 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2704 mm |
| Weight | 1442 kg |
1994 Ford Mondeo dimensions are as follows:
In 1994 Ford Mondeo dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 1994 Ford Mondeo dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.6 i 16V | 4631 mm / 1749 mm / 1442 mm | 34.3 Nm | 53 mm per 1 hp | 1.11 cc in 1 mm | 60 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.8 TD | 4631 mm / 1749 mm / 1442 mm | 26.02 Nm | 53 mm per 1 hp | 1.22 cc in 1 mm | 49 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.8 i 16V | 4631 mm / 1749 mm / 1442 mm | 29.31 Nm | 40 mm per 1 hp | 1.25 cc in 1 mm | 60 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 i 16V | 4631 mm / 1749 mm / 1442 mm | 25.73 Nm | 34 mm per 1 hp | 1.38 cc in 1 mm | 60 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0i 4X4 | 4631 mm / 1749 mm / 1442 mm | 25.73 Nm | 34 mm per 1 hp | 1.38 cc in 1 mm | 67 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.5i 24V | 4631 mm / 1749 mm / 1442 mm | 21.05 Nm | 27 mm per 1 hp | 1.76 cc in 1 mm | 73 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4631 mm / 1749 mm / 1442 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 34.3 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 53 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.11 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 60 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.8 TD |
| Length / width / height | 4631 mm / 1749 mm / 1442 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 26.02 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 53 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.22 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 49 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
| Length / width / height | 4631 mm / 1749 mm / 1442 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 29.31 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 40 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.25 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 60 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
| Length / width / height | 4631 mm / 1749 mm / 1442 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.73 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 34 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.38 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 60 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0i 4X4 |
| Length / width / height | 4631 mm / 1749 mm / 1442 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.73 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 34 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.38 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 67 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.5i 24V |
| Length / width / height | 4631 mm / 1749 mm / 1442 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 21.05 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 27 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.76 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 73 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mondeo 1994 Sedan | 4481 mm | 1750 mm | 1430 mm | 2705 mm | 1350 kg |
| Body | Mondeo 1994 Sedan |
|---|---|
| Length | 4481 mm |
| Width | 1750 mm |
| Height | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2705 mm |
| Weight | 1350 kg |
1994 Ford Mondeo dimensions are as follows:
In 1994 Ford Mondeo dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 1994 Ford Mondeo dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.8 i 16V | 4481 mm / 1749 mm / 1428 mm | 28.36 Nm | 39 mm per 1 hp | 1.26 cc in 1 mm | 56 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.8i 16V | 4481 mm / 1749 mm / 1428 mm | 28.36 Nm | 40 mm per 1 hp | 1.26 cc in 1 mm | 56 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.6 i 16V | 4480 mm / 1750 mm / 1430 mm | 33.43 Nm | 50 mm per 1 hp | 1.12 cc in 1 mm | 53 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.8 TD | 4480 mm / 1750 mm / 1430 mm | 25.17 Nm | 51 mm per 1 hp | 1.23 cc in 1 mm | 45 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 i 16V 4x4 | 4481 mm / 1749 mm / 1428 mm | 24.89 Nm | 33 mm per 1 hp | 1.39 cc in 1 mm | 65 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 i 16V | 4481 mm / 1749 mm / 1428 mm | 23.22 Nm | 33 mm per 1 hp | 1.39 cc in 1 mm | 60 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.5i 24V | 4481 mm / 1749 mm / 1428 mm | 20.37 Nm | 26 mm per 1 hp | 1.78 cc in 1 mm | 70 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4481 mm / 1749 mm / 1428 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 28.36 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 39 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.26 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 56 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
| Length / width / height | 4481 mm / 1749 mm / 1428 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 28.36 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 40 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.26 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 56 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
| Length / width / height | 4480 mm / 1750 mm / 1430 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 33.43 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 50 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.12 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 53 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.8 TD |
| Length / width / height | 4480 mm / 1750 mm / 1430 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.17 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 51 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.23 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 45 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V 4x4 |
| Length / width / height | 4481 mm / 1749 mm / 1428 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 24.89 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 33 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.39 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 65 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
| Length / width / height | 4481 mm / 1749 mm / 1428 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 23.22 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 33 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.39 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 60 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.5i 24V |
| Length / width / height | 4481 mm / 1749 mm / 1428 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 20.37 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 26 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.78 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 70 mm to 1 mpg |