data macau serves not only as a place to view results but also as a reference source for lottery enthusiasts, as it is frequently analyzed by bettors to identify number patterns. This output archive is organized by draw date and time, allowing readers to carefully evaluate historical results and compare the most recent period with previous ones.
Each idn slot online platform has different policies, features, and terms and conditions. Users are advised to review the official rules and use the service responsibly in accordance with applicable regulations.

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-MAX 2020 MPV | 4796 mm | 1916 mm | 1655 mm | 2850 mm | 1876 kg |
| Body | S-MAX 2020 MPV |
|---|---|
| Length | 4796 mm |
| Width | 1916 mm |
| Height | 1655 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2850 mm |
| Weight | 1876 kg |
2020 Ford S-MAX dimensions are as follows:
In 2020 Ford S-MAX dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2020 Ford S-MAX dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 EcoBlue | 4796 mm / 1916 mm / 1655 mm | 11.99 Nm | 25 mm per 1 hp | - | - |
| 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue | 4796 mm / 1916 mm / 1655 mm | 9.59 Nm | 20 mm per 1 hp | - | - |
| 1.5 EcoBoost | 4796 mm / 1916 mm / 1655 mm | 19.82 Nm | 29 mm per 1 hp | - | - |
| Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBlue |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4796 mm / 1916 mm / 1655 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 11.99 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 25 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | - |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |
| Vehicle | 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue |
| Length / width / height | 4796 mm / 1916 mm / 1655 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 9.59 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 20 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | - |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |
| Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
| Length / width / height | 4796 mm / 1916 mm / 1655 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 19.82 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 29 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | - |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-MAX 2016 MPV | 4796 mm | 1916 mm | 1953 mm | 2849 mm | 1766 kg |
| Body | S-MAX 2016 MPV |
|---|---|
| Length | 4796 mm |
| Width | 1916 mm |
| Height | 1953 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2849 mm |
| Weight | 1766 kg |
2016 Ford S-MAX dimensions are as follows:
In 2016 Ford S-MAX dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2016 Ford S-MAX dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.5 EcoBoost | 4796 mm / 1916 mm / 1953 mm | 19.98 Nm | 30 mm per 1 hp | 0.77 cc in 1 mm | 53 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 EcoBoost | 4796 mm / 1916 mm / 1953 mm | 13.9 Nm | 20 mm per 1 hp | 1.02 cc in 1 mm | 74 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 TDCi | 4796 mm / 1916 mm / 1953 mm | 15.47 Nm | 40 mm per 1 hp | 1.02 cc in 1 mm | 41 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 EcoBlue | 4796 mm / 1916 mm / 1953 mm | 14.11 Nm | 40 mm per 1 hp | 1.02 cc in 1 mm | 42 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 4796 mm / 1916 mm / 1953 mm | 9.59 Nm | 20 mm per 1 hp | 1.02 cc in 1 mm | 48 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4796 mm / 1916 mm / 1953 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 19.98 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 30 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 0.77 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 53 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBoost |
| Length / width / height | 4796 mm / 1916 mm / 1953 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 13.9 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 20 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.02 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 74 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
| Length / width / height | 4796 mm / 1916 mm / 1953 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 15.47 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 40 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.02 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 41 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBlue |
| Length / width / height | 4796 mm / 1916 mm / 1953 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 14.11 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 40 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.02 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 42 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue |
| Length / width / height | 4796 mm / 1916 mm / 1953 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 9.59 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 20 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.02 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 48 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-MAX 2010 MPV | 4903 mm | 2154 mm | 1660 mm | 2849 mm | 1733 kg |
| Body | S-MAX 2010 MPV |
|---|---|
| Length | 4903 mm |
| Width | 2154 mm |
| Height | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2849 mm |
| Weight | 1733 kg |
2010 Ford S-MAX dimensions are as follows:
In 2010 Ford S-MAX dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2010 Ford S-MAX dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 Duratec Durashift | 4903 mm / 2154 mm / 1660 mm | - | 34 mm per 1 hp | - | 74 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 EcoBoost | 4903 mm / 2154 mm / 1660 mm | - | 20 mm per 1 hp | - | 77 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.6 Duratorq TDCi | 4903 mm / 2154 mm / 1660 mm | - | 43 mm per 1 hp | - | 48 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.6 EcoBoost SCTi | 4903 mm / 2154 mm / 1660 mm | - | 31 mm per 1 hp | - | 63 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 Duratorq TDCi | 4903 mm / 2154 mm / 1660 mm | - | 30 mm per 1 hp | - | 55 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.2 Duratorq TDCi | 4903 mm / 2154 mm / 1660 mm | - | 25 mm per 1 hp | - | 65 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 Duratec Durashift |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4903 mm / 2154 mm / 1660 mm |
| Length to width ratio | - |
| Length per 1 hp | 34 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | - |
| Width to fuel consumption | 74 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBoost |
| Length / width / height | 4903 mm / 2154 mm / 1660 mm |
| Length to width ratio | - |
| Length per 1 hp | 20 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | - |
| Width to fuel consumption | 77 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.6 Duratorq TDCi |
| Length / width / height | 4903 mm / 2154 mm / 1660 mm |
| Length to width ratio | - |
| Length per 1 hp | 43 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | - |
| Width to fuel consumption | 48 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.6 EcoBoost SCTi |
| Length / width / height | 4903 mm / 2154 mm / 1660 mm |
| Length to width ratio | - |
| Length per 1 hp | 31 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | - |
| Width to fuel consumption | 63 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 Duratorq TDCi |
| Length / width / height | 4903 mm / 2154 mm / 1660 mm |
| Length to width ratio | - |
| Length per 1 hp | 30 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | - |
| Width to fuel consumption | 55 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 Duratorq TDCi |
| Length / width / height | 4903 mm / 2154 mm / 1660 mm |
| Length to width ratio | - |
| Length per 1 hp | 25 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | - |
| Width to fuel consumption | 65 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-MAX 2005 Minivan | 4768 mm | 1884 mm | 1658 mm | 2850 mm | 1736 kg |
| Body | S-MAX 2005 Minivan |
|---|---|
| Length | 4768 mm |
| Width | 1884 mm |
| Height | 1658 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2850 mm |
| Weight | 1736 kg |
2005 Ford S-MAX dimensions are as follows:
In 2005 Ford S-MAX dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2005 Ford S-MAX dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.8 TDCi | 4768 mm / 1884 mm / 1658 mm | 17.03 Nm | 48 mm per 1 hp | 1.06 cc in 1 mm | - |
| 2.0 i 16V | 4768 mm / 1884 mm / 1658 mm | 25.09 Nm | 33 mm per 1 hp | 1.21 cc in 1 mm | 65 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 TDCi | 4768 mm / 1884 mm / 1658 mm | 14.9 Nm | 34 mm per 1 hp | 1.2 cc in 1 mm | 51 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.2 TDCi | 4768 mm / 1884 mm / 1658 mm | 11.92 Nm | 27 mm per 1 hp | 1.31 cc in 1 mm | 52 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.3 T | 4768 mm / 1884 mm / 1658 mm | 22.92 Nm | 30 mm per 1 hp | 1.36 cc in 1 mm | 75 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.5 i 20V | 4768 mm / 1884 mm / 1658 mm | 14.9 Nm | 22 mm per 1 hp | 1.52 cc in 1 mm | 75 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.8 TDCi |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4768 mm / 1884 mm / 1658 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 17.03 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 48 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.06 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | - |
| Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
| Length / width / height | 4768 mm / 1884 mm / 1658 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 25.09 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 33 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.21 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 65 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
| Length / width / height | 4768 mm / 1884 mm / 1658 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 14.9 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 34 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.2 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 51 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
| Length / width / height | 4768 mm / 1884 mm / 1658 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 11.92 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 27 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.31 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 52 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.3 T |
| Length / width / height | 4768 mm / 1884 mm / 1658 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 22.92 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 30 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.36 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 75 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.5 i 20V |
| Length / width / height | 4768 mm / 1884 mm / 1658 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 14.9 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 22 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.52 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 75 mm to 1 mpg |