2019 Ranger IV SuperCab (Americas)
2019 Ranger IV Raptor (Americas)
2019 Ranger IV SuperCrew (Americas)
2015 Ranger III Double Cab (facelift 2015)
2015 Ranger III Super Cab (facelift 2015)
2015 Ranger III Single Cab (facelift 2015)
Ranger III Double Cab
Ranger III Super Cab
2009 Ranger II Double Cab (facelift 2009)
2009 Ranger II Super Cab (facelift 2009)
2006 Ranger II Double Cab
2006 Ranger II Super Cab
Ranger I Super Cab
Ranger I Double Cab
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ranger 2019 Pick-up | 5354 mm | 1862 mm | 1806 mm | 3221 mm | - |
Body | Ranger 2019 Pick-up |
---|---|
Length | 5354 mm |
Width | 1862 mm |
Height | 1806 mm |
Wheelbase | 3221 mm |
Weight | - |
2019 Ford Ranger dimensions are as follows:
In 2019 Ford Ranger dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2019 Ford Ranger dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 EcoBoost | 5354 mm / 1862 mm / 1806 mm | 12.75 Nm | 20 mm per 1 hp | 1.25 cc in 1 mm | 85 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.3 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 5354 mm / 1862 mm / 1806 mm |
Length to width ratio | 12.75 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 20 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.25 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 85 mm to 1 mpg |
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ranger 2019 Pick-up | 5398 mm | 2028 mm | 1873 mm | 3220 mm | 2332 kg |
Body | Ranger 2019 Pick-up |
---|---|
Length | 5398 mm |
Width | 2028 mm |
Height | 1873 mm |
Wheelbase | 3220 mm |
Weight | 2332 kg |
2019 Ford Ranger dimensions are as follows:
In 2019 Ford Ranger dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2019 Ford Ranger dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0d | 5398 mm / 2028 mm / 1873 mm | 10.8 Nm | 25 mm per 1 hp | 1.07 cc in 1 mm | 70 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.0d |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 5398 mm / 2028 mm / 1873 mm |
Length to width ratio | 10.8 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 25 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.07 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 70 mm to 1 mpg |
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ranger 2019 Pick-up | 5354 mm | 1862 mm | 1816 mm | 3221 mm | 2332 kg |
Body | Ranger 2019 Pick-up |
---|---|
Length | 5354 mm |
Width | 1862 mm |
Height | 1816 mm |
Wheelbase | 3221 mm |
Weight | 2332 kg |
2019 Ford Ranger dimensions are as follows:
In 2019 Ford Ranger dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2019 Ford Ranger dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 EcoBoost | 5354 mm / 1862 mm / 1816 mm | 12.75 Nm | 20 mm per 1 hp | 1.25 cc in 1 mm | 85 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.3 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 5354 mm / 1862 mm / 1816 mm |
Length to width ratio | 12.75 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 20 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.25 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 85 mm to 1 mpg |
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ranger 2015 Pick-up | 5277 mm | 1860 mm | 1815 mm | 3220 mm | 2167 kg |
Body | Ranger 2015 Pick-up |
---|---|
Length | 5277 mm |
Width | 1860 mm |
Height | 1815 mm |
Wheelbase | 3220 mm |
Weight | 2167 kg |
2015 Ford Ranger dimensions are as follows:
In 2015 Ford Ranger dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2015 Ford Ranger dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 TDCi | 5277 mm / 1860 mm / 1815 mm | 13.71 Nm | 33 mm per 1 hp | 1.21 cc in 1 mm | 64 mm to 1 mpg |
3.2 TDCi | 5277 mm / 1860 mm / 1815 mm | 11.23 Nm | 26 mm per 1 hp | 1.76 cc in 1 mm | 72 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 5277 mm / 1860 mm / 1815 mm |
Length to width ratio | 13.71 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 33 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.21 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 64 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 3.2 TDCi |
Length / width / height | 5277 mm / 1860 mm / 1815 mm |
Length to width ratio | 11.23 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 26 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.76 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 72 mm to 1 mpg |
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ranger 2015 Pick-up | 5277 mm | 1860 mm | 1804 mm | 3220 mm | 2086 kg |
Body | Ranger 2015 Pick-up |
---|---|
Length | 5277 mm |
Width | 1860 mm |
Height | 1804 mm |
Wheelbase | 3220 mm |
Weight | 2086 kg |
2015 Ford Ranger dimensions are as follows:
In 2015 Ford Ranger dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2015 Ford Ranger dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.2 TDCi | 5277 mm / 1860 mm / 1804 mm | 11.23 Nm | 26 mm per 1 hp | 1.77 cc in 1 mm | 69 mm to 1 mpg |
2.2 TDCi | 5277 mm / 1860 mm / 1804 mm | 15.99 Nm | 41 mm per 1 hp | 1.22 cc in 1 mm | 55 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 3.2 TDCi |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 5277 mm / 1860 mm / 1804 mm |
Length to width ratio | 11.23 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 26 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.77 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 69 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
Length / width / height | 5277 mm / 1860 mm / 1804 mm |
Length to width ratio | 15.99 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 41 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.22 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 55 mm to 1 mpg |
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ranger 2015 Pick-up | 5277 mm | 1860 mm | 1800 mm | 3220 mm | 1969 kg |
Body | Ranger 2015 Pick-up |
---|---|
Length | 5277 mm |
Width | 1860 mm |
Height | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase | 3220 mm |
Weight | 1969 kg |
2015 Ford Ranger dimensions are as follows:
In 2015 Ford Ranger dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2015 Ford Ranger dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 TDCi | 5277 mm / 1860 mm / 1703 mm | 13.71 Nm | 33 mm per 1 hp | 1.29 cc in 1 mm | 60 mm to 1 mpg |
3.2 TDCi | 5277 mm / 1860 mm / 1800 mm | 11.23 Nm | 26 mm per 1 hp | 1.78 cc in 1 mm | 66 mm to 1 mpg |
2.5 | 5277 mm / 1860 mm / 1703 mm | 23.35 Nm | 32 mm per 1 hp | 1.47 cc in 1 mm | - |
Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 5277 mm / 1860 mm / 1703 mm |
Length to width ratio | 13.71 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 33 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.29 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 60 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 3.2 TDCi |
Length / width / height | 5277 mm / 1860 mm / 1800 mm |
Length to width ratio | 11.23 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 26 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.78 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 66 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
Length / width / height | 5277 mm / 1860 mm / 1703 mm |
Length to width ratio | 23.35 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 32 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.47 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | - |
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ranger 2011 Pick-up | 5359 mm | 1850 mm | 1815 mm | 3220 mm | 2083 kg |
Body | Ranger 2011 Pick-up |
---|---|
Length | 5359 mm |
Width | 1850 mm |
Height | 1815 mm |
Wheelbase | 3220 mm |
Weight | 2083 kg |
2011 Ford Ranger dimensions are as follows:
In 2011 Ford Ranger dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2011 Ford Ranger dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 TDCi | 5359 mm / 1850 mm / 1815 mm | 16.75 Nm | 43 mm per 1 hp | 1.21 cc in 1 mm | 60 mm to 1 mpg |
2.5 | 5359 mm / 1850 mm / 1815 mm | 23.71 Nm | 32 mm per 1 hp | 1.37 cc in 1 mm | 84 mm to 1 mpg |
3.2 TDCi | 5359 mm / 1850 mm / 1815 mm | 11.4 Nm | 27 mm per 1 hp | 1.76 cc in 1 mm | 80 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 5359 mm / 1850 mm / 1815 mm |
Length to width ratio | 16.75 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 43 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.21 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 60 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
Length / width / height | 5359 mm / 1850 mm / 1815 mm |
Length to width ratio | 23.71 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 32 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.37 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 84 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 3.2 TDCi |
Length / width / height | 5359 mm / 1850 mm / 1815 mm |
Length to width ratio | 11.4 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 27 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.76 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 80 mm to 1 mpg |
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ranger 2011 Pick-up | 5359 mm | 1850 mm | 1804 mm | 3220 mm | 2073 kg |
Body | Ranger 2011 Pick-up |
---|---|
Length | 5359 mm |
Width | 1850 mm |
Height | 1804 mm |
Wheelbase | 3220 mm |
Weight | 2073 kg |
2011 Ford Ranger dimensions are as follows:
In 2011 Ford Ranger dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2011 Ford Ranger dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 | 5359 mm / 1850 mm / 1804 mm | 23.71 Nm | 32 mm per 1 hp | 1.38 cc in 1 mm | 84 mm to 1 mpg |
2.2 TDCi | 5359 mm / 1850 mm / 1804 mm | 14.29 Nm | 36 mm per 1 hp | 1.22 cc in 1 mm | 74 mm to 1 mpg |
3.2 TDCi | 5359 mm / 1850 mm / 1804 mm | 11.4 Nm | 27 mm per 1 hp | 1.77 cc in 1 mm | 74 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 5359 mm / 1850 mm / 1804 mm |
Length to width ratio | 23.71 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 32 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.38 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 84 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
Length / width / height | 5359 mm / 1850 mm / 1804 mm |
Length to width ratio | 14.29 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 36 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.22 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 74 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 3.2 TDCi |
Length / width / height | 5359 mm / 1850 mm / 1804 mm |
Length to width ratio | 11.4 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 27 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.77 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 74 mm to 1 mpg |
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ranger 2009 Pick-up | 5080 mm | 1788 mm | 1762 mm | 3000 mm | 1845 kg |
Body | Ranger 2009 Pick-up |
---|---|
Length | 5080 mm |
Width | 1788 mm |
Height | 1762 mm |
Wheelbase | 3000 mm |
Weight | 1845 kg |
2009 Ford Ranger dimensions are as follows:
In 2009 Ford Ranger dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2009 Ford Ranger dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TDCi | 5080 mm / 1788 mm / 1762 mm | 15.39 Nm | 36 mm per 1 hp | 1.42 cc in 1 mm | - |
Vehicle | 2.5 TDCi |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 5080 mm / 1788 mm / 1762 mm |
Length to width ratio | 15.39 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 36 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.42 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | - |
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ranger 2009 Pick-up | 5080 mm | 1788 mm | 1762 mm | 3000 mm | 1845 kg |
Body | Ranger 2009 Pick-up |
---|---|
Length | 5080 mm |
Width | 1788 mm |
Height | 1762 mm |
Wheelbase | 3000 mm |
Weight | 1845 kg |
2009 Ford Ranger dimensions are as follows:
In 2009 Ford Ranger dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2009 Ford Ranger dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TDCi | 5080 mm / 1788 mm / 1762 mm | 15.39 Nm | 36 mm per 1 hp | 1.42 cc in 1 mm | - |
Vehicle | 2.5 TDCi |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 5080 mm / 1788 mm / 1762 mm |
Length to width ratio | 15.39 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 36 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.42 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | - |
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ranger 2006 Pick-up | 5170 mm | 2057 mm | 1745 mm | 3000 mm | 1955 kg |
Body | Ranger 2006 Pick-up |
---|---|
Length | 5170 mm |
Width | 2057 mm |
Height | 1745 mm |
Wheelbase | 3000 mm |
Weight | 1955 kg |
2006 Ford Ranger dimensions are as follows:
In 2006 Ford Ranger dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2006 Ford Ranger dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TDCi | 5170 mm / 1715 mm / 1745 mm | 14.77 Nm | 36 mm per 1 hp | 1.43 cc in 1 mm | - |
4.0 V6 | 4800 mm / 2057 mm / 1676 mm | 14.86 Nm | 23 mm per 1 hp | 2.39 cc in 1 mm | - |
2.3 | 4800 mm / 2057 mm / 1676 mm | 22.97 Nm | 34 mm per 1 hp | 1.35 cc in 1 mm | - |
3.0 TDCi | 5075 mm / 1805 mm / 1745 mm | 13.36 Nm | 33 mm per 1 hp | 1.69 cc in 1 mm | 78 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.5 TDCi |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 5170 mm / 1715 mm / 1745 mm |
Length to width ratio | 14.77 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 36 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.43 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | - |
Vehicle | 4.0 V6 |
Length / width / height | 4800 mm / 2057 mm / 1676 mm |
Length to width ratio | 14.86 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 23 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 2.39 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | - |
Vehicle | 2.3 |
Length / width / height | 4800 mm / 2057 mm / 1676 mm |
Length to width ratio | 22.97 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 34 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.35 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | - |
Vehicle | 3.0 TDCi |
Length / width / height | 5075 mm / 1805 mm / 1745 mm |
Length to width ratio | 13.36 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 33 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.69 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 78 mm to 1 mpg |
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ranger 2006 Pick-up | 5075 mm | 1805 mm | 1745 mm | 3000 mm | 1845 kg |
Body | Ranger 2006 Pick-up |
---|---|
Length | 5075 mm |
Width | 1805 mm |
Height | 1745 mm |
Wheelbase | 3000 mm |
Weight | 1845 kg |
2006 Ford Ranger dimensions are as follows:
In 2006 Ford Ranger dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2006 Ford Ranger dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 | 5075 mm / 1805 mm / 1745 mm | 24.28 Nm | 35 mm per 1 hp | 1.29 cc in 1 mm | - |
4.0 V6 | 5075 mm / 1805 mm / 1745 mm | 15.71 Nm | 25 mm per 1 hp | 2.3 cc in 1 mm | - |
3.0 TDCi | 5075 mm / 1805 mm / 1745 mm | 13.36 Nm | 33 mm per 1 hp | 1.69 cc in 1 mm | 78 mm to 1 mpg |
2.5 TDCi | 5075 mm / 1805 mm / 1745 mm | 15.38 Nm | 35 mm per 1 hp | 1.43 cc in 1 mm | 69 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.3 |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 5075 mm / 1805 mm / 1745 mm |
Length to width ratio | 24.28 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 35 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.29 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | - |
Vehicle | 4.0 V6 |
Length / width / height | 5075 mm / 1805 mm / 1745 mm |
Length to width ratio | 15.71 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 25 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 2.3 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | - |
Vehicle | 3.0 TDCi |
Length / width / height | 5075 mm / 1805 mm / 1745 mm |
Length to width ratio | 13.36 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 33 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.69 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 78 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.5 TDCi |
Length / width / height | 5075 mm / 1805 mm / 1745 mm |
Length to width ratio | 15.38 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 35 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.43 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 69 mm to 1 mpg |
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ranger 2001 Pick-up | 4998 mm | 1786 mm | 1740 mm | 3000 mm | 1399 kg |
Body | Ranger 2001 Pick-up |
---|---|
Length | 4998 mm |
Width | 1786 mm |
Height | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase | 3000 mm |
Weight | 1399 kg |
2001 Ford Ranger dimensions are as follows:
In 2001 Ford Ranger dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2001 Ford Ranger dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TDCi | 4998 mm / 1695 mm / 1740 mm | 18.79 Nm | 46 mm per 1 hp | 1.44 cc in 1 mm | - |
3.0 V6 | 4763 mm / 1786 mm / 1648 mm | - | 31 mm per 1 hp | - | - |
4.0 V6 | 4763 mm / 1763 mm / 1648 mm | 14.75 Nm | 23 mm per 1 hp | 2.44 cc in 1 mm | - |
2.3 | 4763 mm / 1786 mm / 1648 mm | 22.79 Nm | 33 mm per 1 hp | 1.37 cc in 1 mm | - |
Vehicle | 2.5 TDCi |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 4998 mm / 1695 mm / 1740 mm |
Length to width ratio | 18.79 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 46 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.44 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | - |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
Length / width / height | 4763 mm / 1786 mm / 1648 mm |
Length to width ratio | - |
Length per 1 hp | 31 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | - |
Width to fuel consumption | - |
Vehicle | 4.0 V6 |
Length / width / height | 4763 mm / 1763 mm / 1648 mm |
Length to width ratio | 14.75 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 23 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 2.44 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | - |
Vehicle | 2.3 |
Length / width / height | 4763 mm / 1786 mm / 1648 mm |
Length to width ratio | 22.79 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 33 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.37 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | - |
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ranger 1998 Pick-up | 5020 mm | 1695 mm | 1750 mm | 3000 mm | 1399 kg |
Body | Ranger 1998 Pick-up |
---|---|
Length | 5020 mm |
Width | 1695 mm |
Height | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase | 3000 mm |
Weight | 1399 kg |
1998 Ford Ranger dimensions are as follows:
In 1998 Ford Ranger dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 1998 Ford Ranger dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TDCi | 5020 mm / 1695 mm / 1750 mm | 18.87 Nm | 46 mm per 1 hp | 1.43 cc in 1 mm | - |
Vehicle | 2.5 TDCi |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 5020 mm / 1695 mm / 1750 mm |
Length to width ratio | 18.87 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 46 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.43 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | - |