Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S-MAX 2020 MPV | 4796 mm | 1916 mm | 1655 mm | 2850 mm | 1876 kg |
Body | S-MAX 2020 MPV |
---|---|
Length | 4796 mm |
Width | 1916 mm |
Height | 1655 mm |
Wheelbase | 2850 mm |
Weight | 1876 kg |
2020 Ford S-MAX dimensions are as follows:
In 2020 Ford S-MAX dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2020 Ford S-MAX dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 EcoBlue | 4796 mm / 1916 mm / 1655 mm | 11.99 Nm | 25 mm per 1 hp | - | - |
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue | 4796 mm / 1916 mm / 1655 mm | 9.59 Nm | 20 mm per 1 hp | - | - |
1.5 EcoBoost | 4796 mm / 1916 mm / 1655 mm | 19.82 Nm | 29 mm per 1 hp | - | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBlue |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 4796 mm / 1916 mm / 1655 mm |
Length to width ratio | 11.99 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 25 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | - |
Width to fuel consumption | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue |
Length / width / height | 4796 mm / 1916 mm / 1655 mm |
Length to width ratio | 9.59 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 20 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | - |
Width to fuel consumption | - |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
Length / width / height | 4796 mm / 1916 mm / 1655 mm |
Length to width ratio | 19.82 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 29 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | - |
Width to fuel consumption | - |
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S-MAX 2016 MPV | 4796 mm | 1916 mm | 1953 mm | 2849 mm | 1766 kg |
Body | S-MAX 2016 MPV |
---|---|
Length | 4796 mm |
Width | 1916 mm |
Height | 1953 mm |
Wheelbase | 2849 mm |
Weight | 1766 kg |
2016 Ford S-MAX dimensions are as follows:
In 2016 Ford S-MAX dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2016 Ford S-MAX dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 EcoBoost | 4796 mm / 1916 mm / 1953 mm | 19.98 Nm | 30 mm per 1 hp | 0.77 cc in 1 mm | 53 mm to 1 mpg |
2.0 EcoBoost | 4796 mm / 1916 mm / 1953 mm | 13.9 Nm | 20 mm per 1 hp | 1.02 cc in 1 mm | 74 mm to 1 mpg |
2.0 TDCi | 4796 mm / 1916 mm / 1953 mm | 15.47 Nm | 40 mm per 1 hp | 1.02 cc in 1 mm | 41 mm to 1 mpg |
2.0 EcoBlue | 4796 mm / 1916 mm / 1953 mm | 14.11 Nm | 40 mm per 1 hp | 1.02 cc in 1 mm | 42 mm to 1 mpg |
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 4796 mm / 1916 mm / 1953 mm | 9.59 Nm | 20 mm per 1 hp | 1.02 cc in 1 mm | 48 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 4796 mm / 1916 mm / 1953 mm |
Length to width ratio | 19.98 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 30 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 0.77 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 53 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBoost |
Length / width / height | 4796 mm / 1916 mm / 1953 mm |
Length to width ratio | 13.9 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 20 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.02 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 74 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
Length / width / height | 4796 mm / 1916 mm / 1953 mm |
Length to width ratio | 15.47 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 40 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.02 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 41 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBlue |
Length / width / height | 4796 mm / 1916 mm / 1953 mm |
Length to width ratio | 14.11 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 40 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.02 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 42 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue |
Length / width / height | 4796 mm / 1916 mm / 1953 mm |
Length to width ratio | 9.59 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 20 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.02 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 48 mm to 1 mpg |
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S-MAX 2010 MPV | 4903 mm | 2154 mm | 1660 mm | 2849 mm | 1733 kg |
Body | S-MAX 2010 MPV |
---|---|
Length | 4903 mm |
Width | 2154 mm |
Height | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase | 2849 mm |
Weight | 1733 kg |
2010 Ford S-MAX dimensions are as follows:
In 2010 Ford S-MAX dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2010 Ford S-MAX dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 Duratec Durashift | 4903 mm / 2154 mm / 1660 mm | - | 34 mm per 1 hp | - | 74 mm to 1 mpg |
2.0 EcoBoost | 4903 mm / 2154 mm / 1660 mm | - | 20 mm per 1 hp | - | 77 mm to 1 mpg |
1.6 Duratorq TDCi | 4903 mm / 2154 mm / 1660 mm | - | 43 mm per 1 hp | - | 48 mm to 1 mpg |
1.6 EcoBoost SCTi | 4903 mm / 2154 mm / 1660 mm | - | 31 mm per 1 hp | - | 63 mm to 1 mpg |
2.0 Duratorq TDCi | 4903 mm / 2154 mm / 1660 mm | - | 30 mm per 1 hp | - | 55 mm to 1 mpg |
2.2 Duratorq TDCi | 4903 mm / 2154 mm / 1660 mm | - | 25 mm per 1 hp | - | 65 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Duratec Durashift |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 4903 mm / 2154 mm / 1660 mm |
Length to width ratio | - |
Length per 1 hp | 34 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | - |
Width to fuel consumption | 74 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBoost |
Length / width / height | 4903 mm / 2154 mm / 1660 mm |
Length to width ratio | - |
Length per 1 hp | 20 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | - |
Width to fuel consumption | 77 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 1.6 Duratorq TDCi |
Length / width / height | 4903 mm / 2154 mm / 1660 mm |
Length to width ratio | - |
Length per 1 hp | 43 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | - |
Width to fuel consumption | 48 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 1.6 EcoBoost SCTi |
Length / width / height | 4903 mm / 2154 mm / 1660 mm |
Length to width ratio | - |
Length per 1 hp | 31 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | - |
Width to fuel consumption | 63 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Duratorq TDCi |
Length / width / height | 4903 mm / 2154 mm / 1660 mm |
Length to width ratio | - |
Length per 1 hp | 30 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | - |
Width to fuel consumption | 55 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.2 Duratorq TDCi |
Length / width / height | 4903 mm / 2154 mm / 1660 mm |
Length to width ratio | - |
Length per 1 hp | 25 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | - |
Width to fuel consumption | 65 mm to 1 mpg |
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S-MAX 2005 Minivan | 4768 mm | 1884 mm | 1658 mm | 2850 mm | 1736 kg |
Body | S-MAX 2005 Minivan |
---|---|
Length | 4768 mm |
Width | 1884 mm |
Height | 1658 mm |
Wheelbase | 2850 mm |
Weight | 1736 kg |
2005 Ford S-MAX dimensions are as follows:
In 2005 Ford S-MAX dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2005 Ford S-MAX dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 TDCi | 4768 mm / 1884 mm / 1658 mm | 17.03 Nm | 48 mm per 1 hp | 1.06 cc in 1 mm | - |
2.0 i 16V | 4768 mm / 1884 mm / 1658 mm | 25.09 Nm | 33 mm per 1 hp | 1.21 cc in 1 mm | 65 mm to 1 mpg |
2.0 TDCi | 4768 mm / 1884 mm / 1658 mm | 14.9 Nm | 34 mm per 1 hp | 1.2 cc in 1 mm | 51 mm to 1 mpg |
2.2 TDCi | 4768 mm / 1884 mm / 1658 mm | 11.92 Nm | 27 mm per 1 hp | 1.31 cc in 1 mm | 52 mm to 1 mpg |
2.3 T | 4768 mm / 1884 mm / 1658 mm | 22.92 Nm | 30 mm per 1 hp | 1.36 cc in 1 mm | 75 mm to 1 mpg |
2.5 i 20V | 4768 mm / 1884 mm / 1658 mm | 14.9 Nm | 22 mm per 1 hp | 1.52 cc in 1 mm | 75 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 1.8 TDCi |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 4768 mm / 1884 mm / 1658 mm |
Length to width ratio | 17.03 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 48 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.06 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Length / width / height | 4768 mm / 1884 mm / 1658 mm |
Length to width ratio | 25.09 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 33 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.21 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 65 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
Length / width / height | 4768 mm / 1884 mm / 1658 mm |
Length to width ratio | 14.9 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 34 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.2 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 51 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
Length / width / height | 4768 mm / 1884 mm / 1658 mm |
Length to width ratio | 11.92 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 27 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.31 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 52 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.3 T |
Length / width / height | 4768 mm / 1884 mm / 1658 mm |
Length to width ratio | 22.92 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 30 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.36 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 75 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.5 i 20V |
Length / width / height | 4768 mm / 1884 mm / 1658 mm |
Length to width ratio | 14.9 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 22 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.52 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 75 mm to 1 mpg |