2018 BT-50 Freestyle Cab II (facelift 2018)
2018 BT-50 Dual Cab II (facelift 2018)
2015 BT-50 Freestyle Cab II (facelift 2015)
2015 BT-50 Dual Cab II (facelift 2015)
2012 BT-50 Freestyle Cab II
2012 BT-50 Dual Cab II
2008 BT-50 Double Cab I (facelift 2008)
2008 BT-50 Freestyle Cab I (facelift 2008)
2006 BT-50 Double Cab I
2006 BT-50 Freestyle Cab I
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BT-50 2018 Pick-up | 5365 mm | 1850 mm | 1810 mm | 3220 mm | 2042 kg |
Body | BT-50 2018 Pick-up |
---|---|
Length | 5365 mm |
Width | 1850 mm |
Height | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase | 3220 mm |
Weight | 2042 kg |
2018 Mazda BT-50 dimensions are as follows:
In 2018 Mazda BT-50 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2018 Mazda BT-50 dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTR 3.2 | 5365 mm / 1850 mm / 1810 mm | 11.41 Nm | 27 mm per 1 hp | 1.77 cc in 1 mm | 77 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | XTR 3.2 |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 5365 mm / 1850 mm / 1810 mm |
Length to width ratio | 11.41 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 27 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.77 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 77 mm to 1 mpg |
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BT-50 2018 Pick-up | 5373 mm | 1850 mm | 1815 mm | 3220 mm | 2105 kg |
Body | BT-50 2018 Pick-up |
---|---|
Length | 5373 mm |
Width | 1850 mm |
Height | 1815 mm |
Wheelbase | 3220 mm |
Weight | 2105 kg |
2018 Mazda BT-50 dimensions are as follows:
In 2018 Mazda BT-50 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2018 Mazda BT-50 dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTR 3.2 | 5365 mm / 1850 mm / 1815 mm | 11.41 Nm | 27 mm per 1 hp | 1.76 cc in 1 mm | 77 mm to 1 mpg |
3.2 | 5373 mm / 1850 mm / 1815 mm | 11.43 Nm | 27 mm per 1 hp | 1.76 cc in 1 mm | 77 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | XTR 3.2 |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 5365 mm / 1850 mm / 1815 mm |
Length to width ratio | 11.41 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 27 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.76 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 77 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 3.2 |
Length / width / height | 5373 mm / 1850 mm / 1815 mm |
Length to width ratio | 11.43 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 27 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.76 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 77 mm to 1 mpg |
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BT-50 2015 Pick-up | 5365 mm | 1850 mm | 1810 mm | 3220 mm | 2056 kg |
Body | BT-50 2015 Pick-up |
---|---|
Length | 5365 mm |
Width | 1850 mm |
Height | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase | 3220 mm |
Weight | 2056 kg |
2015 Mazda BT-50 dimensions are as follows:
In 2015 Mazda BT-50 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2015 Mazda BT-50 dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTR 3.2 | 5365 mm / 1850 mm / 1810 mm | 11.41 Nm | 27 mm per 1 hp | 1.77 cc in 1 mm | 71 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | XTR 3.2 |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 5365 mm / 1850 mm / 1810 mm |
Length to width ratio | 11.41 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 27 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.77 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 71 mm to 1 mpg |
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BT-50 2015 Pick-up | 5373 mm | 1850 mm | 1821 mm | 3220 mm | 2105 kg |
Body | BT-50 2015 Pick-up |
---|---|
Length | 5373 mm |
Width | 1850 mm |
Height | 1821 mm |
Wheelbase | 3220 mm |
Weight | 2105 kg |
2015 Mazda BT-50 dimensions are as follows:
In 2015 Mazda BT-50 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2015 Mazda BT-50 dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.2 | 5373 mm / 1850 mm / 1815 mm | 11.43 Nm | 27 mm per 1 hp | 1.76 cc in 1 mm | 71 mm to 1 mpg |
XTR 3.2 | 5365 mm / 1850 mm / 1821 mm | 11.41 Nm | 27 mm per 1 hp | 1.76 cc in 1 mm | 71 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 3.2 |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 5373 mm / 1850 mm / 1815 mm |
Length to width ratio | 11.43 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 27 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.76 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 71 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | XTR 3.2 |
Length / width / height | 5365 mm / 1850 mm / 1821 mm |
Length to width ratio | 11.41 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 27 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.76 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 71 mm to 1 mpg |
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BT-50 2012 Pick-up | 5365 mm | 1850 mm | 1810 mm | 3220 mm | 2054 kg |
Body | BT-50 2012 Pick-up |
---|---|
Length | 5365 mm |
Width | 1850 mm |
Height | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase | 3220 mm |
Weight | 2054 kg |
2012 Mazda BT-50 dimensions are as follows:
In 2012 Mazda BT-50 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2012 Mazda BT-50 dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTR 3.2 | 5365 mm / 1850 mm / 1810 mm | 11.41 Nm | 27 mm per 1 hp | 1.77 cc in 1 mm | 71 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | XTR 3.2 |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 5365 mm / 1850 mm / 1810 mm |
Length to width ratio | 11.41 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 27 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.77 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 71 mm to 1 mpg |
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BT-50 2012 Pick-up | 5373 mm | 1850 mm | 1821 mm | 3220 mm | 2103 kg |
Body | BT-50 2012 Pick-up |
---|---|
Length | 5373 mm |
Width | 1850 mm |
Height | 1821 mm |
Wheelbase | 3220 mm |
Weight | 2103 kg |
2012 Mazda BT-50 dimensions are as follows:
In 2012 Mazda BT-50 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2012 Mazda BT-50 dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.2 | 5373 mm / 1850 mm / 1815 mm | 11.43 Nm | 27 mm per 1 hp | 1.76 cc in 1 mm | 71 mm to 1 mpg |
XTR 3.2 | 5365 mm / 1850 mm / 1821 mm | 11.41 Nm | 27 mm per 1 hp | 1.76 cc in 1 mm | 71 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 3.2 |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 5373 mm / 1850 mm / 1815 mm |
Length to width ratio | 11.43 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 27 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.76 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 71 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | XTR 3.2 |
Length / width / height | 5365 mm / 1850 mm / 1821 mm |
Length to width ratio | 11.41 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 27 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.76 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 71 mm to 1 mpg |
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BT-50 2008 Pick-up | 5075 mm | 1805 mm | 1760 mm | 3000 mm | 1790 kg |
Body | BT-50 2008 Pick-up |
---|---|
Length | 5075 mm |
Width | 1805 mm |
Height | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase | 3000 mm |
Weight | 1790 kg |
2008 Mazda BT-50 dimensions are as follows:
In 2008 Mazda BT-50 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2008 Mazda BT-50 dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TD | 5075 mm / 1805 mm / 1760 mm | 15.38 Nm | 35 mm per 1 hp | 1.42 cc in 1 mm | 72 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 5075 mm / 1805 mm / 1760 mm |
Length to width ratio | 15.38 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 35 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.42 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 72 mm to 1 mpg |
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BT-50 2008 Pick-up | 5075 mm | 1805 mm | 1745 mm | 3000 mm | 1790 kg |
Body | BT-50 2008 Pick-up |
---|---|
Length | 5075 mm |
Width | 1805 mm |
Height | 1745 mm |
Wheelbase | 3000 mm |
Weight | 1790 kg |
2008 Mazda BT-50 dimensions are as follows:
In 2008 Mazda BT-50 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2008 Mazda BT-50 dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TD | 5075 mm / 1805 mm / 1745 mm | 15.38 Nm | 35 mm per 1 hp | 1.43 cc in 1 mm | 72 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 5075 mm / 1805 mm / 1745 mm |
Length to width ratio | 15.38 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 35 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.43 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 72 mm to 1 mpg |
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BT-50 2006 Pick-up | 5075 mm | 1805 mm | 1755 mm | 3000 mm | 1780 kg |
Body | BT-50 2006 Pick-up |
---|---|
Length | 5075 mm |
Width | 1805 mm |
Height | 1755 mm |
Wheelbase | 3000 mm |
Weight | 1780 kg |
2006 Mazda BT-50 dimensions are as follows:
In 2006 Mazda BT-50 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2006 Mazda BT-50 dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TD | 5075 mm / 1805 mm / 1755 mm | 15.38 Nm | 35 mm per 1 hp | 1.42 cc in 1 mm | 69 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 5075 mm / 1805 mm / 1755 mm |
Length to width ratio | 15.38 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 35 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.42 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 69 mm to 1 mpg |
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BT-50 2006 Pick-up | 5075 mm | 1805 mm | 1755 mm | 3000 mm | 1780 kg |
Body | BT-50 2006 Pick-up |
---|---|
Length | 5075 mm |
Width | 1805 mm |
Height | 1755 mm |
Wheelbase | 3000 mm |
Weight | 1780 kg |
2006 Mazda BT-50 dimensions are as follows:
In 2006 Mazda BT-50 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2006 Mazda BT-50 dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TD | 5075 mm / 1805 mm / 1755 mm | 15.38 Nm | 35 mm per 1 hp | 1.42 cc in 1 mm | 69 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 5075 mm / 1805 mm / 1755 mm |
Length to width ratio | 15.38 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 35 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.42 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 69 mm to 1 mpg |