Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
L 200 2019 Pick-up | 5290 mm | 1815 mm | 1795 mm | 3000 mm | - |
Body | L 200 2019 Pick-up |
---|---|
Length | 5290 mm |
Width | 1815 mm |
Height | 1795 mm |
Wheelbase | 3000 mm |
Weight | - |
2019 Mitsubishi L 200 dimensions are as follows:
In 2019 Mitsubishi L 200 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2019 Mitsubishi L 200 dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 MIVEC | 5290 mm / 1815 mm / 1795 mm | 12.3 Nm | 29 mm per 1 hp | 1.36 cc in 1 mm | - |
Vehicle | 2.4 MIVEC |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 5290 mm / 1815 mm / 1795 mm |
Length to width ratio | 12.3 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 29 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.36 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | - |
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
L 200 2019 Pick-up | 5175 mm | 1815 mm | 1780 mm | 3000 mm | - |
Body | L 200 2019 Pick-up |
---|---|
Length | 5175 mm |
Width | 1815 mm |
Height | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase | 3000 mm |
Weight | - |
2019 Mitsubishi L 200 dimensions are as follows:
In 2019 Mitsubishi L 200 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2019 Mitsubishi L 200 dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 MIVEC | 5175 mm / 1815 mm / 1780 mm | 12.03 Nm | 29 mm per 1 hp | 1.37 cc in 1 mm | - |
Vehicle | 2.4 MIVEC |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 5175 mm / 1815 mm / 1780 mm |
Length to width ratio | 12.03 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 29 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.37 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | - |
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
L 200 2019 Pick-up | 5300 mm | 1815 mm | 1795 mm | 3000 mm | - |
Body | L 200 2019 Pick-up |
---|---|
Length | 5300 mm |
Width | 1815 mm |
Height | 1795 mm |
Wheelbase | 3000 mm |
Weight | - |
2019 Mitsubishi L 200 dimensions are as follows:
In 2019 Mitsubishi L 200 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2019 Mitsubishi L 200 dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 MIVEC | 5300 mm / 1815 mm / 1795 mm | 12.33 Nm | 29 mm per 1 hp | 1.36 cc in 1 mm | - |
Vehicle | 2.4 MIVEC |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 5300 mm / 1815 mm / 1795 mm |
Length to width ratio | 12.33 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 29 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.36 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | - |
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
L 200 2015 Pick-up | 5080 mm | 1785 mm | 1780 mm | 3000 mm | 1790 kg |
Body | L 200 2015 Pick-up |
---|---|
Length | 5080 mm |
Width | 1785 mm |
Height | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase | 3000 mm |
Weight | 1790 kg |
2015 Mitsubishi L 200 dimensions are as follows:
In 2015 Mitsubishi L 200 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2015 Mitsubishi L 200 dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4d | 5080 mm / 1785 mm / 1780 mm | 13.37 Nm | 33 mm per 1 hp | 1.37 cc in 1 mm | 53 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.4d |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 5080 mm / 1785 mm / 1780 mm |
Length to width ratio | 13.37 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 33 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.37 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 53 mm to 1 mpg |
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
L 200 2015 Pick-up | 5195 mm | 1785 mm | 1775 mm | 3000 mm | 1805 kg |
Body | L 200 2015 Pick-up |
---|---|
Length | 5195 mm |
Width | 1785 mm |
Height | 1775 mm |
Wheelbase | 3000 mm |
Weight | 1805 kg |
2015 Mitsubishi L 200 dimensions are as follows:
In 2015 Mitsubishi L 200 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2015 Mitsubishi L 200 dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4d | 5195 mm / 1785 mm / 1775 mm | 13.67 Nm | 34 mm per 1 hp | 1.38 cc in 1 mm | 53 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.4d |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 5195 mm / 1785 mm / 1775 mm |
Length to width ratio | 13.67 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 34 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.38 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 53 mm to 1 mpg |
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
L 200 2015 Pick-up | 5285 mm | 1815 mm | 1780 mm | 3000 mm | 1860 kg |
Body | L 200 2015 Pick-up |
---|---|
Length | 5285 mm |
Width | 1815 mm |
Height | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase | 3000 mm |
Weight | 1860 kg |
2015 Mitsubishi L 200 dimensions are as follows:
In 2015 Mitsubishi L 200 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2015 Mitsubishi L 200 dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4d | 5285 mm / 1815 mm / 1780 mm | 12.29 Nm | 29 mm per 1 hp | 1.37 cc in 1 mm | 59 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.4d |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 5285 mm / 1815 mm / 1780 mm |
Length to width ratio | 12.29 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 29 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.37 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 59 mm to 1 mpg |
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
L 200 2010 Pick-up | 5185 mm | 1750 mm | 1775 mm | 3000 mm | 1900 kg |
Body | L 200 2010 Pick-up |
---|---|
Length | 5185 mm |
Width | 1750 mm |
Height | 1775 mm |
Wheelbase | 3000 mm |
Weight | 1900 kg |
2010 Mitsubishi L 200 dimensions are as follows:
In 2010 Mitsubishi L 200 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2010 Mitsubishi L 200 dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 HP DI-D | 5185 mm / 1750 mm / 1775 mm | 12.96 Nm | 29 mm per 1 hp | 1.4 cc in 1 mm | 56 mm to 1 mpg |
2.5 DI-D | 5185 mm / 1750 mm / 1775 mm | 16.51 Nm | 38 mm per 1 hp | 1.4 cc in 1 mm | 56 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.5 HP DI-D |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 5185 mm / 1750 mm / 1775 mm |
Length to width ratio | 12.96 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 29 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.4 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 56 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.5 DI-D |
Length / width / height | 5185 mm / 1750 mm / 1775 mm |
Length to width ratio | 16.51 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 38 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.4 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 56 mm to 1 mpg |
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
L 200 2006 Pick-up | 5000 mm | 1750 mm | 1775 mm | 3000 mm | 1935 kg |
Body | L 200 2006 Pick-up |
---|---|
Length | 5000 mm |
Width | 1750 mm |
Height | 1775 mm |
Wheelbase | 3000 mm |
Weight | 1935 kg |
2006 Mitsubishi L 200 dimensions are as follows:
In 2006 Mitsubishi L 200 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2006 Mitsubishi L 200 dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TD | 5000 mm / 1750 mm / 1775 mm | 15.92 Nm | 37 mm per 1 hp | 1.4 cc in 1 mm | 65 mm to 1 mpg |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 5000 mm / 1750 mm / 1775 mm |
Length to width ratio | 15.92 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 37 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.4 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | 65 mm to 1 mpg |
Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
L 200 1996 Pick-up | 4500 mm | 1655 mm | 1570 mm | 2230 mm | 1820 kg |
Body | L 200 1996 Pick-up |
---|---|
Length | 4500 mm |
Width | 1655 mm |
Height | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase | 2230 mm |
Weight | 1820 kg |
1996 Mitsubishi L 200 dimensions are as follows:
In 1996 Mitsubishi L 200 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 1996 Mitsubishi L 200 dimensions differ from world average:
Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i 2WD | 4500 mm / 1655 mm / 1570 mm | 29.22 Nm | 47 mm per 1 hp | 1.27 cc in 1 mm | - |
2.5 TD 4x4 | 4500 mm / 1655 mm / 1570 mm | 18.75 Nm | 45 mm per 1 hp | 1.58 cc in 1 mm | - |
2.4 4x4 | 4500 mm / 1655 mm / 1570 mm | 23.44 Nm | 34 mm per 1 hp | 1.5 cc in 1 mm | - |
2.5 TD 4X4 | 4500 mm / 1655 mm / 1570 mm | 18.75 Nm | 50 mm per 1 hp | 1.58 cc in 1 mm | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 2WD |
---|---|
Length / width / height | 4500 mm / 1655 mm / 1570 mm |
Length to width ratio | 29.22 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 47 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.27 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | - |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD 4x4 |
Length / width / height | 4500 mm / 1655 mm / 1570 mm |
Length to width ratio | 18.75 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 45 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.58 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | - |
Vehicle | 2.4 4x4 |
Length / width / height | 4500 mm / 1655 mm / 1570 mm |
Length to width ratio | 23.44 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 34 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.5 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | - |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD 4X4 |
Length / width / height | 4500 mm / 1655 mm / 1570 mm |
Length to width ratio | 18.75 Nm |
Length per 1 hp | 50 mm per 1 hp |
Engine cc to height ratio | 1.58 cc in 1 mm |
Width to fuel consumption | - |