data macau serves not only as a place to view results but also as a reference source for lottery enthusiasts, as it is frequently analyzed by bettors to identify number patterns. This output archive is organized by draw date and time, allowing readers to carefully evaluate historical results and compare the most recent period with previous ones.
Each idn slot online platform has different policies, features, and terms and conditions. Users are advised to review the official rules and use the service responsibly in accordance with applicable regulations.

2018 BT-50 Freestyle Cab II (facelift 2018)

2018 BT-50 Dual Cab II (facelift 2018)

2015 BT-50 Freestyle Cab II (facelift 2015)

2015 BT-50 Dual Cab II (facelift 2015)

2012 BT-50 Freestyle Cab II

2012 BT-50 Dual Cab II

2008 BT-50 Double Cab I (facelift 2008)

2008 BT-50 Freestyle Cab I (facelift 2008)

2006 BT-50 Double Cab I

2006 BT-50 Freestyle Cab I

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BT-50 2018 Pick-up | 5365 mm | 1850 mm | 1810 mm | 3220 mm | 2042 kg |
| Body | BT-50 2018 Pick-up |
|---|---|
| Length | 5365 mm |
| Width | 1850 mm |
| Height | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3220 mm |
| Weight | 2042 kg |
2018 Mazda BT-50 dimensions are as follows:
In 2018 Mazda BT-50 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2018 Mazda BT-50 dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XTR 3.2 | 5365 mm / 1850 mm / 1810 mm | 11.41 Nm | 27 mm per 1 hp | 1.77 cc in 1 mm | 77 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | XTR 3.2 |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 5365 mm / 1850 mm / 1810 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 11.41 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 27 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.77 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 77 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BT-50 2018 Pick-up | 5373 mm | 1850 mm | 1815 mm | 3220 mm | 2105 kg |
| Body | BT-50 2018 Pick-up |
|---|---|
| Length | 5373 mm |
| Width | 1850 mm |
| Height | 1815 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3220 mm |
| Weight | 2105 kg |
2018 Mazda BT-50 dimensions are as follows:
In 2018 Mazda BT-50 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2018 Mazda BT-50 dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XTR 3.2 | 5365 mm / 1850 mm / 1815 mm | 11.41 Nm | 27 mm per 1 hp | 1.76 cc in 1 mm | 77 mm to 1 mpg |
| 3.2 | 5373 mm / 1850 mm / 1815 mm | 11.43 Nm | 27 mm per 1 hp | 1.76 cc in 1 mm | 77 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | XTR 3.2 |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 5365 mm / 1850 mm / 1815 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 11.41 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 27 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.76 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 77 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 3.2 |
| Length / width / height | 5373 mm / 1850 mm / 1815 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 11.43 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 27 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.76 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 77 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BT-50 2015 Pick-up | 5365 mm | 1850 mm | 1810 mm | 3220 mm | 2056 kg |
| Body | BT-50 2015 Pick-up |
|---|---|
| Length | 5365 mm |
| Width | 1850 mm |
| Height | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3220 mm |
| Weight | 2056 kg |
2015 Mazda BT-50 dimensions are as follows:
In 2015 Mazda BT-50 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2015 Mazda BT-50 dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XTR 3.2 | 5365 mm / 1850 mm / 1810 mm | 11.41 Nm | 27 mm per 1 hp | 1.77 cc in 1 mm | 71 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | XTR 3.2 |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 5365 mm / 1850 mm / 1810 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 11.41 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 27 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.77 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 71 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BT-50 2015 Pick-up | 5373 mm | 1850 mm | 1821 mm | 3220 mm | 2105 kg |
| Body | BT-50 2015 Pick-up |
|---|---|
| Length | 5373 mm |
| Width | 1850 mm |
| Height | 1821 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3220 mm |
| Weight | 2105 kg |
2015 Mazda BT-50 dimensions are as follows:
In 2015 Mazda BT-50 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2015 Mazda BT-50 dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.2 | 5373 mm / 1850 mm / 1815 mm | 11.43 Nm | 27 mm per 1 hp | 1.76 cc in 1 mm | 71 mm to 1 mpg |
| XTR 3.2 | 5365 mm / 1850 mm / 1821 mm | 11.41 Nm | 27 mm per 1 hp | 1.76 cc in 1 mm | 71 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 3.2 |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 5373 mm / 1850 mm / 1815 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 11.43 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 27 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.76 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 71 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | XTR 3.2 |
| Length / width / height | 5365 mm / 1850 mm / 1821 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 11.41 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 27 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.76 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 71 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BT-50 2012 Pick-up | 5365 mm | 1850 mm | 1810 mm | 3220 mm | 2054 kg |
| Body | BT-50 2012 Pick-up |
|---|---|
| Length | 5365 mm |
| Width | 1850 mm |
| Height | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3220 mm |
| Weight | 2054 kg |
2012 Mazda BT-50 dimensions are as follows:
In 2012 Mazda BT-50 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2012 Mazda BT-50 dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XTR 3.2 | 5365 mm / 1850 mm / 1810 mm | 11.41 Nm | 27 mm per 1 hp | 1.77 cc in 1 mm | 71 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | XTR 3.2 |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 5365 mm / 1850 mm / 1810 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 11.41 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 27 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.77 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 71 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BT-50 2012 Pick-up | 5373 mm | 1850 mm | 1821 mm | 3220 mm | 2103 kg |
| Body | BT-50 2012 Pick-up |
|---|---|
| Length | 5373 mm |
| Width | 1850 mm |
| Height | 1821 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3220 mm |
| Weight | 2103 kg |
2012 Mazda BT-50 dimensions are as follows:
In 2012 Mazda BT-50 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2012 Mazda BT-50 dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.2 | 5373 mm / 1850 mm / 1815 mm | 11.43 Nm | 27 mm per 1 hp | 1.76 cc in 1 mm | 71 mm to 1 mpg |
| XTR 3.2 | 5365 mm / 1850 mm / 1821 mm | 11.41 Nm | 27 mm per 1 hp | 1.76 cc in 1 mm | 71 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 3.2 |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 5373 mm / 1850 mm / 1815 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 11.43 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 27 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.76 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 71 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | XTR 3.2 |
| Length / width / height | 5365 mm / 1850 mm / 1821 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 11.41 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 27 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.76 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 71 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BT-50 2008 Pick-up | 5075 mm | 1805 mm | 1760 mm | 3000 mm | 1790 kg |
| Body | BT-50 2008 Pick-up |
|---|---|
| Length | 5075 mm |
| Width | 1805 mm |
| Height | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3000 mm |
| Weight | 1790 kg |
2008 Mazda BT-50 dimensions are as follows:
In 2008 Mazda BT-50 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2008 Mazda BT-50 dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 TD | 5075 mm / 1805 mm / 1760 mm | 15.38 Nm | 35 mm per 1 hp | 1.42 cc in 1 mm | 72 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 5075 mm / 1805 mm / 1760 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 15.38 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 35 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.42 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 72 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BT-50 2008 Pick-up | 5075 mm | 1805 mm | 1745 mm | 3000 mm | 1790 kg |
| Body | BT-50 2008 Pick-up |
|---|---|
| Length | 5075 mm |
| Width | 1805 mm |
| Height | 1745 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3000 mm |
| Weight | 1790 kg |
2008 Mazda BT-50 dimensions are as follows:
In 2008 Mazda BT-50 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2008 Mazda BT-50 dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 TD | 5075 mm / 1805 mm / 1745 mm | 15.38 Nm | 35 mm per 1 hp | 1.43 cc in 1 mm | 72 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 5075 mm / 1805 mm / 1745 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 15.38 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 35 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.43 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 72 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BT-50 2006 Pick-up | 5075 mm | 1805 mm | 1755 mm | 3000 mm | 1780 kg |
| Body | BT-50 2006 Pick-up |
|---|---|
| Length | 5075 mm |
| Width | 1805 mm |
| Height | 1755 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3000 mm |
| Weight | 1780 kg |
2006 Mazda BT-50 dimensions are as follows:
In 2006 Mazda BT-50 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2006 Mazda BT-50 dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 TD | 5075 mm / 1805 mm / 1755 mm | 15.38 Nm | 35 mm per 1 hp | 1.42 cc in 1 mm | 69 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 5075 mm / 1805 mm / 1755 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 15.38 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 35 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.42 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 69 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BT-50 2006 Pick-up | 5075 mm | 1805 mm | 1755 mm | 3000 mm | 1780 kg |
| Body | BT-50 2006 Pick-up |
|---|---|
| Length | 5075 mm |
| Width | 1805 mm |
| Height | 1755 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3000 mm |
| Weight | 1780 kg |
2006 Mazda BT-50 dimensions are as follows:
In 2006 Mazda BT-50 dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2006 Mazda BT-50 dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 TD | 5075 mm / 1805 mm / 1755 mm | 15.38 Nm | 35 mm per 1 hp | 1.42 cc in 1 mm | 69 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 5075 mm / 1805 mm / 1755 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 15.38 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 35 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.42 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 69 mm to 1 mpg |