
| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C-HR 2020 SUV | 4390 mm | 1795 mm | 1565 mm | 2640 mm | 1420 kg |
| Body | C-HR 2020 SUV |
|---|---|
| Length | 4390 mm |
| Width | 1795 mm |
| Height | 1565 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2640 mm |
| Weight | 1420 kg |
2020 Toyota C-HR dimensions are as follows:
In 2020 Toyota C-HR dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2020 Toyota C-HR dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.2 | 4390 mm / 1795 mm / 1565 mm | 23.73 Nm | 38 mm per 1 hp | 0.76 cc in 1 mm | 51 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.8 | 4390 mm / 1795 mm / 1565 mm | 30.92 Nm | 45 mm per 1 hp | 1.15 cc in 1 mm | 29 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 | 4390 mm / 1795 mm / 1565 mm | 23.23 Nm | 30 mm per 1 hp | 1.27 cc in 1 mm | 53 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.2 |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4390 mm / 1795 mm / 1565 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 23.73 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 38 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 0.76 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 51 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.8 |
| Length / width / height | 4390 mm / 1795 mm / 1565 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 30.92 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 45 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.15 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 29 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 |
| Length / width / height | 4390 mm / 1795 mm / 1565 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 23.23 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 30 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.27 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 53 mm to 1 mpg |

| Body | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C-HR 2017 SUV | 4360 mm | 1796 mm | 1565 mm | 2640 mm | 1497 kg |
| Body | C-HR 2017 SUV |
|---|---|
| Length | 4360 mm |
| Width | 1796 mm |
| Height | 1565 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2640 mm |
| Weight | 1497 kg |
2017 Toyota C-HR dimensions are as follows:
In 2017 Toyota C-HR dimensions showed such length to power ratio:
The 2017 Toyota C-HR dimensions differ from world average:
| Vehicle | Length / width / height | Length to 1 Nm | Length per 1 hp | Engine cc to height ratio | Width to fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.2 | 4360 mm / 1795 mm / 1565 mm | 23.57 Nm | 38 mm per 1 hp | 0.76 cc in 1 mm | 49 mm to 1 mpg |
| 1.8 | 4360 mm / 1795 mm / 1555 mm | 30.7 Nm | 44 mm per 1 hp | 1.16 cc in 1 mm | 29 mm to 1 mpg |
| 2.0 | 4348 mm / 1796 mm / 1565 mm | 23.13 Nm | 30 mm per 1 hp | 1.27 cc in 1 mm | 62 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.2 |
|---|---|
| Length / width / height | 4360 mm / 1795 mm / 1565 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 23.57 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 38 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 0.76 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 49 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 1.8 |
| Length / width / height | 4360 mm / 1795 mm / 1555 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 30.7 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 44 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.16 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 29 mm to 1 mpg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 |
| Length / width / height | 4348 mm / 1796 mm / 1565 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 23.13 Nm |
| Length per 1 hp | 30 mm per 1 hp |
| Engine cc to height ratio | 1.27 cc in 1 mm |
| Width to fuel consumption | 62 mm to 1 mpg |